핵심요약

• 트럼프 대통령은 뉴욕타임스의 보도를 '반역적'이라고 주장하며 150억 달러의 명예훼손 소송에 추가할 예정이라고 밝혔습니다.
• 트럼프는 이란의 인플레이션이 250%에 달했다고 주장했지만, 뉴욕타임스는 이란이 호르무즈 해협을 다시 폐쇄했다고 보고했습니다.
• 트럼프는 이란의 군사력과 경제가 완전히 무너졌다고 주장하며 여러 수치를 제시했습니다.
• 트럼프는 이전에도 뉴욕타임스에 대한 150억 달러의 명예훼손 소송을 제기한 바 있습니다.

도입

이번 뉴스는 트럼프 대통령과 뉴욕타임스 간의 긴장 관계를 보여주며, 정치적 영향력과 언론의 역할에 대한 논쟁을 다시 불러일으키고 있습니다. 투자자들은 트럼프의 정책과 언론의 보도가 시장에 미치는 영향을 주시해야 합니다.

본문 1: 트럼프의 이란 정책과 시장 반응

트럼프 대통령은 이란과의 전쟁에서 여러 목표를 달성했다고 주장하며, 이란의 군사력과 경제가 완전히 무너졌다고 주장했습니다. 그러나 뉴욕타임스는 트럼프의 주장과 달리 이란이 호르무즈 해협을 다시 폐쇄했다고 보고하며, 트럼프의 정책이 기대만큼 효과를 보지 못하고 있음을 시사했습니다. 이는 트럼프의 정책에 대한 신뢰도를 떨어뜨릴 수 있으며, 시장에도 부정적인 영향을 미칠 수 있습니다.

본문 2: 트럼프의 소송과 언론의 역할

트럼프 대통령은 뉴욕타임스의 보도를 '반역적'이라고 주장하며, 150억 달러의 명예훼손 소송에 추가할 예정이라고 밝혔습니다. 이는 트럼프가 언론의 보도를 통해 자신의 이미지가 훼손되었다고 느끼고 있음을 보여주며, 정치적 영향력과 언론의 역할에 대한 논쟁을 다시 불러일으키고 있습니다. 투자자들은 트럼프의 소송이 어떻게 진행될지 주시해야 합니다.

본문 3: 장기적 전망

트럼프의 이란 정책과 뉴욕타임스의 보도가 시장에 미치는 영향은 장기적으로도 지속될 수 있습니다. 트럼프의 정책이 기대만큼 효과를 보지 못하면, 그의 정치적 영향력이 약화될 수 있으며, 이는 시장에도 부정적인 영향을 미칠 수 있습니다. 또한, 트럼프의 소송이 어떻게 진행될지 주시해야 합니다.

결론

트럼프 대통령과 뉴욕타임스의 갈등은 정치적 영향력과 언론의 역할에 대한 논쟁을 다시 불러일으키고 있으며, 투자자들은 트럼프의 정책과 언론의 보도가 시장에 미치는 영향을 주시해야 합니다. 트럼프의 소송이 어떻게 진행될지 주시해야 하며, 장기적으로는 그의 정책이 시장에도 영향을 미칠 수 있습니다.

---

원문 링크: https://news.google.com/rss/articles/CBMihwFBVV95cUxOdVdJOWI2NXZ2anZqODZMZWdrMFdRRGRoellHSHdqM0pQRXhmNEJlRXhqOUlRX2tlem13V3ZIT0ZHMHFzR25jb2g2WWh1UVlITFJnS3hncWYzUmNSaVlxMmlubnFKdVhiZmctR0RTUnkwUlJZYXNKSllMZFdSYURXNEhBT0ZxZVk?oc=5

Trump Calls New York Times “Treasonous” Over Iran War Criticism - The New Republic

President Donald Trump furiously accused The New York Times of supposedly “treasonous” reporting about his disastrous peace deal with Iran.

In a series of posts on Truth Social Sunday, Trump ranted about the Times after it published an analysis of the president’s war in Iran: “What Changed After Almost 4 Months of War? Analysts Say Not Much.” The article highlighted that Trump’s deal failed to achieve any of his war’s objectives: eliminating Iran’s nuclear program , destroying its ballistic missile stockpile , annihilating Iran’s navy and security infrastructure, and installing a new regime.

“Their Military is DONE, their Navy is GONE, their Air Force is GONE, their Launching Pads, Missiles, Drones and Manufacturing of same, is almost GONE, their top two sets of Leaders are GONE, their Inflation is at 250%, their Economy is BROKEN, their Soldiers aren’t being paid, the Hormuz Strait is OPEN, THE OIL IS GUSHING, and the U.S. Stock Market and Jobs are at record HIGHS,” Trump wrote . “That’s what’s CHANGED, you corrupt and unethical cowards, and MORE!!!”

In reality, Iran shuttered trade through Strait of Hormuz yet again over the weekend, citing Israel’s ceasefire violations in Lebanon.

But Trump didn’t care about any of that. Instead, he shared a post by Senator Lindsey Graham, who echoed the president’s claim that the reporting had revealed the outlet’s “bias.”

“The way the Corrupt and Failing New York Times is covering stories on a very battered and beat up Iran, through FAKE & MADE UP ‘FACTS’ is, in my opinion, ‘TREASONOUS,’” Trump wrote in yet another post.

“I will be adding all of their false and ridiculous reporting to my multi Billion Dollar lawsuit against them. They are Criminals!”

In October, Trump refiled an abridged version of his dismissed $15 billion defamation suit against the Times , alleging that reporters at the paper had sought to undermine his reputation as an entrepreneur and reality television star.

What began as a restoration project for the Lincoln Memorial Reflecting Pool has resulted in multiple arrests.

At least five people have been arrested for allegedly vandalizing the pool as of Saturday night, a Trump administration official told CBS News . Five citations were also issued, bringing the grand total of post-renovation citations issued at the site to 14.

In a post on Truth Social the same day, President Donald Trump said that the monument would likely have to be drained another time in order to address the damage, which he said included the use of a “knife or blade” to put a “250 foot long gash into the beautiful facade.” He also claimed that individuals that participated in the destruction poured “corrosive and destructive chemicals” into the pool. He said that all those caught participating deserved “ years in jail .”

“Work will begin immediately on fixing the seriously vandalized Reflecting Pool,” Trump wrote in a separate post on Sunday. “I just inspected it, and could only say to myself, and those gathered around me, WOW, who would do such a thing? SICK, DERANGED PEOPLE! We will fix it?”

The White House has so far spent nearly $15 million to rid the Reflecting Pool of algae ahead of the country’s 250th anniversary, but the multimillion-dollar project appears to be another dud. Within days of refilling the pool earlier this month, the algae was back.

The Department of the Interior blamed the algae’s resurgence, in part, on residual algae that had accumulated in the pool’s pipes, which were apparently neglected during the cleaning process. CNN also found abnormally high phosphate levels in the pool after sampling its water. An algae researcher at the Smithsonian described the chemical imbalance as a “field day” for algal growth.

Park workers have tried to address the endemic issue with a smattering of different solutions. On Tuesday, park workers in hi-vis vests were spotted dumping gallons of hydrogen peroxide into the Reflecting Pool. A close-up of their equipment revealed that they were using a 12 percent concentrate, a level that can cause problems if inhaled and burns if the chemical touches the skin, according to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention .

Hydrogen peroxide is generally considered less environmentally destructive as its compounds readily break down in water, but the high concentration could nonetheless pose a risk to some of the pool’s frequent visitors, such as ducks or other birds. One dead baby duck was caught floating in the pool over the weekend, though the cause of death was unclear.

The Trump administration is refusing to declare in writing that the president’s $1.776 billion “Anti-Weaponization Fund” is actually dead.

Last week, U.S. District Judge Leonie Brinkema ordered that “Acting Attorney General Todd Blanche, Associate Attorney General Stanley Woodward, Jr., and Secretary of the Treasury Scott Bessent FILE a declaration under the penalty of perjury that they will not take any action to create or operate the Anti-Weaponization Fund, and that the Anti-Weaponization Fund will not proceed in any manner, or under any name,” issuing a preliminary injunction and giving the government a deadline of June 19.

The deadline arrived on Friday, and the Department of Justice responded by refusing to file such a declaration due to “serious separation of powers concerns.” The DOJ claimed that Blanche’s congressional testimony earlier this month that the fund is “not going forward, period” is enough, along with similar statements from other administration officials.

This raises questions as to whether the Trump administration is sneakily trying to keep the fund alive in some form. After Blanche’s congressional testimony, Trump was asked if he was ending his slush fund plans. “No, a court ruled against it,” Trump said, going on to argue that “these are people that have been decimated” and “they should be reimbursed for a crooked government.”

Last week, The Atlantic reported that White House officials were still telling President Trump’s allies that they would get some form of payment, even with Blanche’s public statements disavowing the fund.

Department of Justice lawyers also refused to declare the fund dead in writing to another federal judge, Richard Leon, more than a week ago. At the time, anonymous sources told The Atlantic that work was continuing on the fund inside the Trump administration in secret. With that in mind, Friday’s court filing from White House officials makes it seem like they are trying to skirt the law and create the slush fund anyway.

The Department of Justice claims that it’s released every document that’s required under the Epstein Files Transparency Act. But the agency previously said it collected more than six million pages of material during its investigation into Jeffrey Epstein, and it only released around three million. So what’s in the rest of the Epstein files?

The DOJ claims that the other three million pages are either duplicates, unrelated to Epstein, or protected by legal privilege. But because of the administration’s lack of transparency in regard to Epstein, many are concerned that something is still being hidden.

CBS News analyzed the available files to try to figure out which documents appeared to be missing, and found a number of notable omissions: questionable redactions, missing emails from older accounts, lack of massage scheduling records after 2009, missing prison surveillance footage, and more.

Source: https://news.google.com/rss/articles/CBMihwFBVV95cUxOdVdJOWI2NXZ2anZqODZMZWdrMFdRRGRoellHSHdqM0pQRXhmNEJlRXhqOUlRX2tlem13V3ZIT0ZHMHFzR25jb2g2WWh1UVlITFJnS3hncWYzUmNSaVlxMmlubnFKdVhiZmctR0RTUnkwUlJZYXNKSllMZFdSYURXNEhBT0ZxZVk?oc=5