핵심요약

• 미국은 이란 작전을 우선시하기 위해 항공모함을 태평양에서 철수시키고 있습니다.
• USS George Washington과 USS Abraham Lincoln은 정신 건강 및 보급 문제에 대한 우려를 낳고 있습니다.
• 미국의 태평양 철수는 동맹국들의 불안정을 심화시키고 중국에게 전략적 기회를 제공합니다.
• 중국은 미국의 분산된 관심으로 인해 자신들의 야심을 실현할 기회를 얻고 있습니다.

도입

본 기사는 미국이 이란에 대한 군사 작전에 집중하면서 태평양 지역에서 항공모함을 철수시키는 상황을 다루고 있습니다. 이는 단순한 군사적 이동을 넘어, 미국의 외교 정책 변화가 동북아시아의 지정학적 균형과 중국의 전략적 목표에 미치는 영향을 분석하는 데 중요합니다. 투자자들은 이러한 미국의 전략적 우선순위 변화가 글로벌 공급망과 지역 안보에 미칠 파급 효과를 면밀히 살펴볼 필요가 있습니다.

본문 1: 군사적 이동과 내부적 부담

미국이 항공모함을 철수시키는 배경에는 이란과의 장기 작전으로 인해 함선들의 정신 건강 및 보급 문제에 대한 우려가 작용하고 있습니다. USS George Washington과 USS Abraham Lincoln이 태평양에서 이동하는 것은 이러한 운영의 부담이 미국 해군 인력에게 미치는 영향을 보여줍니다. 이는 장기적인 군사 작전이 인력과 자원의 지속 가능성에 미치는 현실적인 제약을 반영하며, 군사 작전의 효율성과 지속성에 대한 근본적인 질문을 제기합니다. 즉, 군사적 목표 달성이 인력 관리와 물류 보급이라는 내부적 요인과 어떻게 상호작용하는지를 보여주는 사례입니다.

본문 2: 지정학적 공백과 중국의 기회

미국의 태평양 철수는 동맹국들에게 예측 불가능한 리스크를 안겨주며 불안정성을 증폭시킵니다. 이러한 미국의 전략적 후퇴는 중국에게는 자신들의 야심을 실현할 수 있는 외교적, 군사적 공백을 제공합니다. 중국은 미국 군사력의 분산된 관심과 동맹국들의 불확실성을 이용하여 태평양 지역에서의 영향력을 확대할 기회로 읽고 있습니다. 이는 중국이 대만 문제와 관련하여 군사적 압박을 가하는 데 있어 미국의 개입이 제한적일 수 있다는 점을 시사하며, 중국의 전략적 목표 달성 가능성을 높이는 요인으로 작용합니다.

본문 3: 장기적 전망과 위험 요소

항공모함의 부재는 중국이 자신들의 강점을 과시할 기회를 제공하지만, 이는 미국과 중국 간의 관계 악화로 이어질 수 있는 장기적인 위험을 내포합니다. 미국이 아시아-태평양 지역에서 후퇴하는 움직임은 동맹국들의 신뢰를 약화시키고, 이는 장기적으로 지역 안보 협력 체제의 약화로 이어질 수 있습니다. 따라서 향후 미국이 지역 안보에 대한 약속을 어떻게 재정립하고, 중국의 팽창에 어떻게 대응할지에 대한 국제적 관심이 집중될 전망입니다. 이러한 지정학적 변동성은 글로벌 공급망과 무역 관계에도 간접적인 영향을 미칠 수 있습니다.

결론

결론적으로, 미국 항공모함의 태평양 철수는 군사적 부담과 지정학적 공백이라는 두 가지 차원에서 분석되어야 합니다. 이는 단기적으로 중국에게 전략적 기회를 제공하지만, 장기적으로는 미국과 중국 간의 전략적 경쟁 심화라는 더 큰 위험을 내포합니다. 향후 지역 안보 환경에서 동맹국들의 결속력과 미국의 전략적 일관성이 어떻게 유지될지에 대한 지속적인 관찰이 필요합니다. 투자자들은 이러한 지정학적 변동성이 글로벌 시장에 미치는 영향을 고려하여 포트폴리오를 관리해야 할 것입니다.

---

원문 링크: https://news.google.com/rss/articles/CBMi2wFBVV95cUxORURHSVozdVNUZVgwN1NHSWVRY2YyQlM3UkNyeUgxLTVCck02QWMzb1FzTko1ZlZhUVBPY2I5Nk5jaFBKVVppby1Ic3RMdUVLc0ttQzdIXzFMbU5LbWFGRVpfUHNidzdJVWttNEQtaXdnSjl0dnZ6UENvazFFTGVVQTdtMkhQYW5peW80ZFMzSjBLOG1iRWlKRWs0a0pKZHNKU2x5T3RsSHNGS3lHOXBfMkNJck9OSkdLT0U4cTVpYk5feHVaTWt3MzF5LWZsZzcwcGxscTVxbFRJRmc?oc=5

US military moving last aircraft carrier out of the Pacific to prioritize operations in Iran - New York Post

See more of our coverage in your search results.

WASHINGTON — President Trump’s war against Iran is stretching the limits of US aircraft carriers and leaving the western Pacific without one of the key American warships as China shows more signs of aggression.

The USS George Washington is departing the Pacific and expected to replace the USS Abraham Lincoln in the Middle East amid growing concerns about mental health and supply issues aboard the long-deployed carrier. The Lincoln has had its time at sea extended from its original May return date to support operations against Iran.

The lack of a US carrier in the Pacific may be short-lived if the Navy deploys another in the next couple of months. But it shows how the open-ended operations with Iran are running some American sailors ragged, analysts say, while the Trump administration further retreats from the Asia-Pacific region and focuses on the Western Hemisphere.

“The administration says that the Pacific is supposed to be the most important behind the Western Hemisphere,” said Greg Poling, director of the Southeast Asia Program at the Center for Strategic and International Studies. Instead, the US is “doing the exact opposite” of its previously expressed goal of pulling out of the Middle East.

American allies in the Pacific are unsettled over the unpredictability of the Republican administration, Poling said, while Beijing “is quite happy with US distraction, with the frustration of US allies and partners.”

Beijing sees the US military presence in the region as a threat to China’s rise and an obstacle to its ambition to seize Taiwan, the self-governing island it claims as its own. But the United States has argued that the Pacific region is too important economically to lose.

No one expects China to invade Taiwan because an American aircraft carrier has left the region. But the carrier’s absence gives the Chinese another opportunity to show its strength , said Bryan Clark, a former Navy submariner who is a defense analyst at the Hudson Institute.

“They’re using this as part of the narrative to demonstrate to the Philippines, to Japan, to Indonesia and others that the US is not the big dog in the western Pacific anymore,” Clark said. “They would just prefer that countries in the region decide that China is the bigger power and the US is not able to guarantee their security anymore.”

China conducted naval exercises this week with Indonesia and recently has shown signs of aggression toward Japan and the Philippines, two key US allies that also have territorial disputes with Beijing.

China carried out military drills this month near the Scarborough Shoal in the South China Sea. Both China and the Philippines have claims over the shoal . Last month, a Chinese guided-missile destroyer conducted a live-fire exercise off Japan’s southernmost island of Okinotori.

Adm. Frank Bradley, head of the US Special Operations Command, has been trying to reassure regional allies of Washington’s commitment. He was in Manila on Thursday, telling his Filipino counterparts that US special operations forces are ready to step up joint exercises to strengthen the countries’ alliance. He also is expected to travel to Japan.

“We have the ability to project force, the United States, anywhere on the globe,” Bradley told The Associated Press. “And when the threat in the region of the Middle East has been attended to, we will redeploy and reorient and be able to project that force wherever else it might be required.”

“I also feel very confident in the Armed Forces of the Philippines’ ability to protect their sovereignty here and for us to remain close with them,” he said.

Evan Sankey, a policy analyst at the Cato Institute who focuses on US policy toward China, said aircraft carriers provide psychological assurance to US allies. The absence of carriers in the region, he said, “adds to the general sense that the US is distracted by events in the Middle East.”

Trump has relied heavily on aircraft carriers to support military operations during his second term. For example, the USS Gerald R. Ford returned home in mid-May after an 11-month deployment, the longest since the Vietnam War, during which it supported the US fight against Iran and the capture of Venezuela’s then-leader, Nicolás Maduro.

The Ford had experienced a fire in a laundry space that forced the carrier to turn around and return to the Mediterranean Sea for repairs and left hundreds of sailors without places to sleep. Meanwhile, the Lincoln has spent a record uninterrupted time at sea of more than 240 days. Democratic lawmakers have been calling for investigations and greater visibility into conditions aboard the ship.

Warships and their crews can only handle so much, said Robert Farley, who teaches national security and diplomacy at the University of Kentucky and often writes about aircraft carriers.

“People don’t get enough rest. It’s psychologically exhausting. And R&R is part of keeping the crew healthy,” Farley said. “Sometimes it’s framed as, ‘These people haven’t had a vacation.’ But we are dealing with well-known limits on the capacity of a crew to operate at top efficiency over time. And that just declines.”

Clark, of the Hudson Institute, said the squeeze on the nation’s aircraft carriers stems from the lack of preparation and planning for the Iran war.

“If we were going to mobilize to do this kind of conflict, and we anticipated it might go this long, we might have done some changes to the carrier schedule to make sure more would be available,” Clark said.

Clark said the Navy has 11 aircraft carriers and typically deploys two or three at a time. But it could soon deploy four if the USS Theodore Roosevelt leaves San Diego for the Middle East, allowing the Washington to return to Pacific.

But the massive warships will need maintenance, likely causing a bottleneck at the nation’s only two carrier shipyards.

“We’ll end up with a maintenance debt that needs to be paid for the next few years,” Clark said. “We’ll probably have less carrier presence than we’ve had in the previous years because carriers will be lined up to get into the shipyard.”

Michael Swaine, a senior research fellow in the Quincy Institute’s East Asia Program, questions the future need for aircraft carriers as warfare rapidly changes.

Source: https://news.google.com/rss/articles/CBMi2wFBVV95cUxORURHSVozdVNUZVgwN1NHSWVRY2YyQlM3UkNyeUgxLTVCck02QWMzb1FzTko1ZlZhUVBPY2I5Nk5jaFBKVVppby1Ic3RMdUVLc0ttQzdIXzFMbU5LbWFGRVpfUHNidzdJVWttNEQtaXdnSjl0dnZ6UENvazFFTGVVQTdtMkhQYW5peW80ZFMzSjBLOG1iRWlKRWs0a0pKZHNKU2x5T3RsSHNGS3lHOXBfMkNJck9OSkdLT0U4cTVpYk5feHVaTWt3MzF5LWZsZzcwcGxscTVxbFRJRmc?oc=5