핵심요약

• 7500만 명 이상의 이란 인터넷 사용자가 제한된 온라인 접속을 경험하고 있습니다.
• 인스타그램과 틱톡과 같은 인기 있는 소셜 미디어 플랫폼에 접근하는 것이 VPN을 사용해도 극히 어렵습니다.
• 정부는 최고 국가 안보 회의의 조건 하에 인터넷을 재개했으며, 이는 우회하는 것이 훨씬 더 어렵습니다.
• 감시와 모니터링이 강화되었으며, 솔루션과 우회 방법은 실시간으로 지속적으로 모니터링되고 있습니다.

도입

이란의 인터넷 검열 강화는 투자자에게 중요한 의미를 가집니다. 이는 기술 기업의 운영 환경에 영향을 미치며, 특히 글로벌 소셜 미디어 플랫폼의 접근성 문제를 야기합니다. 또한, VPN 서비스와 관련 기술 기업의 비즈니스 모델에도 영향을 줄 수 있습니다.

본문 1: 인터넷 검열의 경제적 영향

이란의 인터넷 검열 강화는 기술 기업의 운영 환경에 직접적인 영향을 미칩니다. 인스타그램과 틱톡과 같은 플랫폼은 이란 시장에서의 접근성이 제한되어 매출 감소로 이어질 수 있습니다. 또한, VPN 서비스의 사용이 어려워지면서 관련 기업의 수익에도 부정적인 영향을 미칠 수 있습니다. 이는 글로벌 기술 기업의 이란 시장 진출을 더욱 어렵게 만들 것입니다.

본문 2: VPN 시장 전망

VPN 서비스의 사용이 어려워지면서, 이란 시장에서의 수요는 감소할 가능성이 높습니다. 이는 VPN 기업의 수익에 직접적인 영향을 미칠 수 있습니다. 또한, 새로운 기술적 해결책이 개발되더라도, 정부의 감시와 모니터링이 강화되면서 그 효과가 제한될 수 있습니다. 이는 VPN 기업의 장기적인 성장 전망을 어둡게 할 수 있습니다.

본문 3: 글로벌 기술 기업의 대응

글로벌 기술 기업은 이란 시장에서의 접근성 문제를 해결하기 위해 새로운 전략을 수립해야 합니다. 예를 들어, 현지 파트너와 협력하여 정부와 협상하거나, 기술적 해결책을 개발하는 것이 필요할 수 있습니다. 또한, 다른 시장으로의 확장도 고려해야 할 것입니다. 이는 기업의 비즈니스 모델에 중요한 변화를 요구할 수 있습니다.

결론

이란의 인터넷 검열 강화는 기술 기업과 VPN 서비스 기업에 부정적인 영향을 미칠 가능성이 높습니다. 그러나 새로운 기술적 해결책이나 전략적 대응을 통해 이 영향을 완화할 수 있을 것입니다. 투자자는 이란 시장의 동향과 관련 기업의 대응 전략을 주의 깊게 관찰해야 합니다.

---

원문 링크: https://news.google.com/rss/articles/CBMiakFVX3lxTE9NM0xuTElJXzZyU2p5ZDdBdmMtSzNxcnlFTzFEUHlpMTA3M3lIbVViUllDY0tOb01nRWM2d1ByaVB5T2Fab1VNWUp5d2MxU2dJbHRBOUhEVXVpMXJXQUNiU0dSZVkyRmNudWc?oc=5

IRGC continues to censor internet activity in Iran - The Jerusalem Post

While peace negotiations between senior officials of the Islamic Republic and the United States continue in Switzerland, more than 75 million internet users in Iran are still contending with heavily restricted online access. Although internet access has been gradually restored over the past four weeks, users say the current online environment bears little resemblance to what existed before the January 8 internet blackout and the violent crackdown on protesters that followed. According to users, not only has internet speed declined further, but access to some of the most popular social media platforms, including Instagram and TikTok, remains extremely difficult even through various VPN services. A source familiar with Iran's communications sector told The Media Line that the government has reopened the internet under conditions imposed by the Supreme National Security Council on the Supreme Council of Cyberspace. “One of the main conditions was that the quality of access to, and control over, the global internet be altered in such a way that it becomes far more manageable and controllable,” he said. “VPNs are also being heavily monitored and tracked, and in practice, bypassing censorship has become considerably more difficult than before.” Iranian officials continue to block internet access; solutions are limitedAccording to the source, surveillance and monitoring aimed at updating blocklists have also intensified on an hour-by-hour basis. Responding to a question about the effectiveness of solutions and workarounds proposed by internet platforms and activists, the source said that virtually all of them are monitored continuously and in real time, making the lifespan of such solutions very limited. The source argued that the only viable solution would be the widespread availability of Starlink to millions of people. In that scenario, the creation of house-to-house networks and broader access would make it significantly more difficult for the government to monitor and track Starlink usage. Estimates suggest that around half a million people across the country—primarily in northern Tehran—have access to Starlink. However, any carelessness by users when accessing domestic websites could expose them to identification and tracking. Security agencies have also established various traps to target Starlink applicants, increasing distrust of Starlink providers. In recent weeks, raids by members of the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps, the police, and the Ministry of Intelligence on private homes to confiscate Starlink equipment have intensified, in some cases resulting in violent confrontations resulting in injury or even death. Some of the newly surfaced videos from the January massacre circulating on social media are deeply disturbing. Following an 88-day shutdown that outside monitors described as one of the longest nationwide blackouts ever recorded, the return of connectivity allowed more images and testimony to emerge online, documenting the January crackdown and the broader civilian toll of the conflict. However, the Islamic Republic's numerous security agencies also used the reopening of the internet to hunt down opponents and individuals communicating with journalists abroad or sending images and information to outside media. Niko, a young protester in Tehran, told The Media Line that the Islamic regime has imposed extensive controls on internet access, making online content and social media significantly less accessible than before the internet blackout. Despite the risks of contact with foreign journalists, Niko, an Iranian protester, told The Media Line that while the Islamic Republic claims it has restored internet access, it has reduced speeds to the point that even VPNs that were functioning reasonably well a few months ago are practically unusable. “At the same time, if you used government-approved applications while your VPN was active, you could be immediately identified, and they could cut off your access. The money you paid for the VPN would effectively be wasted,” she said. In her most recent message, sent while the Islamic Republic and the United States had once again been involved in hostilities despite a ceasefire, she expressed serious concern about another internet shutdown. “If they cut the internet again, our situation will become even worse. The next step for the Islamic Republic will probably be to take away our mobile phones,” she said. Human rights orgs. are threatened over backlash to internet restrictionsWhile Iranian officials have acknowledged the economic costs of internet restrictions, communication with human rights and civil society activists inside the country remains severely restricted. Many of them have been subjected to threats and intimidation designed to force them into silence. The internet is not officially shut down, but repression and suffocation have become even more severe than before the January crackdown, according to some sources. Tara Dachek, a human rights activist based in Canada, told The Media Line that the internet situation in Iran is no longer merely about censorship: “The scope of filtering has expanded to such an extent that communications that were previously possible can no longer be achieved.” She noted that many people cannot access Starlink because of its rising cost, while bringing the equipment into the country has become more difficult and now carries harsher penalties. Dachek also referred to Iran's so-called tiered internet system, under which users are divided into several categories with sharply different levels of access. One group, she explained, enjoys unrestricted access to the entire internet. These are generally the same individuals who monitor the internet, track activists, create fake and counterintelligence networks, infiltrate opposition circles, and foster divisions among opponents. They are often affiliated with intelligence institutions. The second group consists of regime agents and officials who occupy the next tier and have access to most internet content except for certain blacklisted pornographic websites. They are responsible for propaganda activities and routine government operations. The third group faces greater restrictions but can still access platforms such as X. These are insiders who benefit from what is often described as a form of “white internet.” At the lowest level, she said, are ordinary citizens, who account for the vast majority of users. They have access to almost no content other than approved material and Islamic Republic applications, where surveillance and monitoring can be carried out with relative ease. According to Dachek, the central issue is precisely this classification system: determining which voices inside the country are allowed to be heard and which must be silenced. Well-known and popular figures such as rapper Toomaj Salehi, Iranian Nobel Peace Prize laureate Narges Mohammadi, and numerous civil rights activists, including Sepideh Qolian, have faced extensive threats. Some users who posted content on Instagram that could be interpreted as criticism of the war have recently published images of judicial summonses ordering them to appear before Revolutionary Prosecutors' Offices for questioning and prosecution. Meanwhile, CITNA, a website specializing in information technology news in Iran, has reported that 68% of active Instagram users have still not returned to the platform following the restoration of internet access. Users say that commonly available VPN services still fail to provide reliable access to Instagram, which has remained restricted since the Woman, Life, Freedom uprising in 2022. Beyond repression and political control, internet shutdowns in Iran have contributed to rising levels of depression among young people. In research presented by the author at the Global Communication Association conference in Casablanca last year, findings showed that internet filtering in Iran contributes to increased depression and hopelessness among young people. While digital freedom remains a central demand for many Iranians, shutdowns can also create risks for the authorities by intensifying public anger and pushing political grievances from online spaces into public protest. This is the same fear referenced on Sunday by President Masoud Pezeshkian, who warned that if people reach the limits of their endurance, they will once again flood the streets.

Source: https://news.google.com/rss/articles/CBMiakFVX3lxTE9NM0xuTElJXzZyU2p5ZDdBdmMtSzNxcnlFTzFEUHlpMTA3M3lIbVViUllDY0tOb01nRWM2d1ByaVB5T2Fab1VNWUp5d2MxU2dJbHRBOUhEVXVpMXJXQUNiU0dSZVkyRmNudWc?oc=5