트럼프 대통령의 이란 협상, 지지자들 14명 중 14명 비판하며 3000억 달러 재건자금에 반발
Trump’s Iran deal falls short for these voters — and some fear it could cost Republicans the midterm - The Mighty 790 KFGO
트럼프 대통령의 이란과의 임시 합의에 대한 유권자들의 반응이 엇갈리는데요, 이는 중간에 치러지는 선거 결과에 부정적인 영향을 미칠 수 있습니다. 이에 따라 단기적인 시장 반응도 중립적으로 예상됩니다.
핵심 요약
트럼프 대통령의 이란 협상에 대해 18명 중 14명의 지지자가 3000억 달러 재건 자금에 반발하며 비판적 반응을 보였습니다.
핵심요약
- 18명의 트럼프 지지자 중 14명이 협상 비판
- 25%만 이란 전쟁 가치가 있었다고 생각
- 이란에 3000억 달러 재건 자금 제공 계획
- 다수는 휴전 협정이 오래가지 않을 것이라고 우려
도입
트럼프 대통령의 이란 협상은 미국 정치에 큰 파장을 일으키고 있습니다. 특히 중동 지역 안정화와 미국 경제에 미치는 영향이 투자자들에게 중요한 관심사입니다. 이번 협상이 미국 선거 결과와 어떻게 연결될지 예측하는 것이 핵심입니다.
본문 1: 트럼프 지지자들 반응 분석
18명의 트럼프 지지자 중 14명이 협상에 비판적인 반응을 보였습니다. 특히 이란에 3000억 달러의 재건 자금을 제공하는 것에 대해 반발하고 있으며, 이란이 협정을 준수할 수 있을지 의심하고 있습니다. 트럼프 대통령의 지지자들 중 일부는 이미 대통령에 대한 신뢰를 잃기 시작했고, 이번 협상이 공화당이 중선거에서 승리하는 데 장애물이 될 수 있다고 우려하고 있습니다.
본문 2: 중동 지역 안정화 전망
이번 협상으로 호르무즈 해협이 재개통되었으며, 미국은 이란에 대한 석유 제재를 일시적으로 해제했습니다. 이는 중동 지역 안정화에 기여할 수 있지만, 이란의 군사 capabilities가 여전히 유지되고 있다는 점에서 장기적인 안정화는 불확실합니다. 투자자들은 이란과 미국 간의 관계 변화가 에너지 시장에 미칠 영향에 주목하고 있습니다.
결론
트럼프 대통령의 이란 협상은 미국 정치와 경제에 큰 영향을 미칠 가능성이 있습니다. 특히 중선거 결과와 에너지 시장에 미칠 영향이 주목받고 있습니다. 투자자들은 이번 협상이 장기적으로 중동 지역 안정화에 기여할지, 또는 추가적인 갈등을 야기할지 주의 깊게 관찰해야 합니다.
Original Article
Trump’s Iran deal falls short for these voters — and some fear it could cost Republicans the midterm - The Mighty 790 KFGO
June 27 – President Donald Trump’s interim agreement to end the war with Iran has dragged down his approval rating and garnered criticism across the political spectrum — even from his own supporters.
Recent interviews with 18 Americans who voted for Trump in 2024, a group that Reuters has interviewed monthly since he returned to office, show that most have doubts about the deal, which has reopened the Strait of Hormuz while temporarily lifting U.S. oil sanctions on Iran and authorizing a $300 billion fund for its reconstruction.
“We need to truly weaken the Iranian regime instead of this, ‘beat them up a little bit and then step back and let them rebuild’,” said Terry Alberta, 65, a pilot in Michigan.
Overall, only a quarter of Americans believe the war with Iran was worth the costs, and a majority worry that the truce with Tehran is unlikely to last, according to the latest Reuters/Ipsos poll.
Many of the Trump voters feared his unpopular concessions to Iran would make it harder for Republicans to retain control of Congress in November’s midterm elections, although those most critical of the deal had already begun to lose faith in the president before the war. Six in the group believed he still had plans to bring down the Iranian government.
The group largely supported the war during its early days, believing U.S. strikes were necessary to deplete Iran’s stockpile of long-range missiles and cripple its nuclear program.
Nearly four months later, with Iran politically emboldened and many of its military capabilities still intact, 14 of the voters criticized some aspects of the memorandum of understanding announced on June 14. Most were skeptical that Tehran could be trusted to honor any agreement and dismayed by the prospect of granting it billions of dollars to rebuild.
The $300 billion fund will be a private investment vehicle rather than a government-funded plan, though exact details have not been released.
Juan Rivera, 26, said Trump “criticized his predecessors about negotiating with terrorists, and he’s basically done the same exact thing.”
TRUMP’S MIDTERM ENDORSEMENT NOW ‘KISS OF DEATH’?
Rivera still plans to support mostly Republican candidates in the midterms. But he said that when he volunteered recently to canvass Latino voters in his community near San Diego, many fellow Trump supporters were so disappointed by the president’s handling of the war, among other issues, that they felt unmotivated to back his party in November.
“A lot of people say: ‘Why should I vote when the president’s not doing what he promised?'” Rivera recalled.
Asked for comment, a White House spokesperson told Reuters that Trump’s achievement “on the battlefield and at the negotiating table is nothing short of remarkable and will strengthen American security for many years.”
Steve Egan, 65, a promotional product distributor in Tampa, soured on Trump in early 2025 after tariff-triggered price hikes hurt his business. From the outset, Egan was skeptical of the president’s rationale for the war and upset that it further jacked up the price of gas and other goods.
“Right now it doesn’t seem like it’s been worth it to go through all that,” he said, noting that the stated goal of regime change “didn’t happen.” His opinion of the president is now so low, Egan said, that Trump’s endorsement would be “the kiss of death” for him when deciding which candidates to vote for in the midterms.
Brandon Neumeister, 37, a Pennsylvania state corrections worker and former National Guardsman, said the conflict seemed only to have benefited oil companies. Even before the war, though, Neumeister said he was unlikely to vote in November because he was disgusted with politics.
Robert Billups, 35, of Washington state, was cautiously optimistic the peace deal would hold. But he believed the war had spawned more hostility toward the United States rather than making the country safer.
Vice President JD Vance, tasked with leading U.S. negotiations with Iran, has fallen in his esteem, and Billups said he no longer feels preferential toward Republican candidates. Come November, “whoever has a better strategy this time, I’m gonna vote for them regardless of their party,” he said.
Though Trump has been adamant about wanting to end the war, six of his more loyal voters expressed hope that he still had secret plans to bring Iran to heel.
Kate Mottl, 63, a secretary at a municipal office in the Chicago suburbs, said that “destroying” the regime in Tehran seemed like the only way to avert future conflict.
It would be “very disappointing” if Trump refrained from further military intervention, Mottl said, adding that she believed “there’s a bigger plan here.”
Rich Somora, 62, an engineer in North Carolina, agreed that Trump probably had more aggressive plans up his sleeve. “I can’t imagine that he would have gone through all this and not found out a way to get rid of those mullahs,” he said.
According to diplomats and analysts, however, the war has only strengthened the grip of Iran’s clerical rulers. If they remain in power for another month, Somora said, he’ll start to worry.
In Prescott, Arizona, 74-year-old retiree Joyce Kenney said she supported lifting sanctions and believed restoring Iran’s ability to trade with other countries would ensure its leaders honored the truce.
But the reconstruction fund was a bridge too far: “That’s not our responsibility,” she said.