핵심요약

• 원유 연소로 인해 이산화탄소, 이산화황, 질소산화물 등의 오염 물질이 배출되어 대기 질 악화와 산성비 형성을 유발합니다.
• '검은 비' 현상은 그 자체로 전쟁의 파괴뿐 아니라 환경이 남긴 독성 유산을 상징합니다.
• 폭발과 화학 물질 누출은 공기, 토양, 수계 시스템에 대량의 오염 물질을 방출하여 생태계를 파괴합니다.
• 석유 시설 공격은 온실가스 배출을 증가시켜 더 넓은 기후 위기에 기여합니다.

도입

본 기사는 중동 분쟁이 야기하는 환경적 파괴가 어떻게 글로벌 기후 위기와 연결되는지를 조명합니다. 투자자들은 지정학적 리스크가 단순한 군사적 충돌을 넘어 환경적 비용이라는 새로운 차원의 위험을 내포하고 있음을 인식해야 합니다. 전쟁으로 인한 환경 오염은 장기적으로 자원 접근성, 보건 비용, 그리고 녹색 전환 정책의 비용을 증가시키는 구조적 위험 요소로 작용합니다.

본문 1: 지정학적 리스크와 환경 오염의 연결고리

분쟁 지역에서의 에너지 인프라 공격은 즉각적인 환경 오염을 발생시키는 주요 원인입니다. 특히 원유 시설과 정제소에 대한 공격은 원유를 태워 연소시키는 과정에서 이산화탄소, 황산화물, 질소산화물, 미세먼지 등 대량의 오염 물질을 배출합니다. 이러한 오염 물질은 국경을 넘어 대기 질을 악화시키고 산성비를 형성하며, 이는 광범위한 지역의 토양과 수자원에 독성 영향을 미칩니다. 따라서 지정학적 갈등은 환경적 재앙을 동반하며, 이는 국제 사회의 규제 및 협력 체계에 새로운 부담을 지우게 됩니다. 이는 단순히 군사적 손실을 넘어 환경적 비용을 포함하는 포괄적인 위험 평가가 필수적임을 시사합니다.

본문 2: 환경 파괴의 장기적 영향과 기후 위기 가속화

환경 오염은 단기적인 대기 질 악화에 그치지 않고 더 광범위한 기후 위기에 영향을 미칩니다. 석유 화재와 폭발로 인해 방출되는 막대한 양의 온실가스(이산화탄소 등)는 지구 온난화를 가속화하는 핵심 동인으로 작용합니다. '검은 비' 현상은 매연 입자가 대기 중 수증기와 섞여 지표로 떨어지는 현상으로, 이는 농경지 및 수자원을 오염시켜 생태계의 지속 가능성을 위협합니다. 이러한 환경적 영향은 장기적으로 물 부족, 식량 안보 문제, 그리고 생물 다양성 감소와 같은 복합적인 위협을 증대시킵니다. 따라서 환경 파괴를 기후 변화라는 거시적 관점에서 분석하는 것은 미래의 경제적 안정성을 예측하는 데 결정적인 통찰을 제공합니다.

본문 3: 환경적 리스크의 투자 함의

환경적 비용은 미래 산업 및 정책 결정에 중대한 영향을 미칩니다. 분쟁 지역의 환경 파괴는 에너지 전환 정책의 비용을 증가시키고, 환경 규제 준수에 대한 국제적 압력을 높입니다. 투자 관점에서 볼 때, 기업들은 환경적 책임(ESG)을 고려하여 공급망 리스크와 운영 비용을 재평가해야 합니다. 특히 에너지 및 산업 부문 기업들은 환경 오염 물질 배출 감소 및 기후 변화 적응 기술에 대한 투자를 통해 장기적인 경쟁력을 확보해야 할 것입니다. 환경 리스크는 이제 별도의 이슈가 아니라 모든 투자 결정에 내재된 핵심 변수로 간주되어야 합니다.

결론

전쟁의 환경적 비용은 눈에 띄지 않지만 심각한 독성 유산을 남기며, 이는 지정학적 리스크와 기후 위기를 결합하여 투자 환경에 새로운 변수를 제공합니다. 향후 투자자들은 이러한 환경적 연관성을 고려하여 지정학적 상황을 분석하고, 환경적 회복력(resilience)을 갖춘 자산과 기업에 주목해야 할 것입니다. 환경적 비용을 관리하는 것이 장기적인 경제적 안정성을 확보하는 데 필수적입니다.

---

원문 링크: https://news.google.com/rss/articles/CBMipAFBVV95cUxOV2xMck9NNDMyLWpjcVhKUVRtdUU1UjI5ZXlFWUVlY1RabEhYYUpzanBNOVljeUY1MDYxVmRsU0tNdTFQREljdjRRWGRyTWgzMmp5WmhaNUNvTVRYNnlIU3kzal9sVmJCZzYwRjJEVFhad3FtYUZSQ3Z0S0NwYXZIcnh6SFc0NHY0MjhZVmxiNDJQdEc4Slc1SlVBVHIyZVJ1Qm5odNIBqgFBVV95cUxNNG9EX0s1NmFtVVlkeWNkMnRPUVlaZzBJc190NG5HYlBvbGhET19ZOG5sdWp4MEtSQ01IcVpNR0REaTltYll6eUVqOUhXbU8tOTkzVEh6M0JmT0VHS1FxdDAyb0RPUExMZkJRQU1oUkNjT0F5Wkx6dzlidU9BQkJVbllTZGlRSVpUX0Nzd1d6YkxyOVpfcTJUSzlEM29TNnRFT2pJdFBtT1JIQQ?oc=5

Black rain and burning oil: environmental cost of war in the Middle East - The Nation Newspaper

As tensions escalate in the Middle East between Iran, the United States and Israel, the world’s attention has largely focused on military strategy, geopolitics and humanitarian concerns. Yet beneath the headlines lies another unfolding crisis; one that is less visible but equally consequential: the environmental destruction caused by modern warfare. Recent strikes on oil facilities, industrial zones and energy infrastructure in parts of Iran have triggered fires, toxic emissions and widespread pollution. Reports of darkened skies and what observers have described as “black rain” have raised alarm among environmental experts. “War does not only destroy cities and lives; it poisons the air, land and water that sustain them.” These developments highlight a critical but often overlooked dimension of conflict; the lasting damage to ecosystems and the climate. When War Meets the Environment: Modern warfare is not only destructive to lives and infrastructure; it is also deeply harmful to the environment. Explosions, oil fires, chemical leaks and the destruction of industrial facilities release massive quantities of pollutants into the air, soil and water systems. In the current conflict, attacks on oil depots and refineries may be particularly damaging. Burning crude oil produces thick plumes of smoke containing carbon dioxide, sulfur dioxide, nitrogen oxides and particulate matter. These pollutants contribute to air quality deterioration, acid rain formation and long-term health risks. “Black rain is not just a symbol of destruction, it is a toxic legacy that can outlive the war itself.” The phenomenon of contaminated rainfall occurs when soot and chemical particles mix with atmospheric moisture and fall back to the ground, poisoning farmland and water sources. A Climate Setback in Real Time: Beyond immediate pollution, these environmental impacts feed into the broader climate crisis. Oil fires and explosions release significant amounts of greenhouse gases, accelerating global warming at a time when countries are struggling to meet emissions reduction targets. Military activities themselves have been considered to be carbon-intensive. Fighter jets, naval fleets and armoured vehicles consume vast amounts of fossil fuels, yet these emissions are rarely captured in global climate accounting. “The climate cost of war is often invisible, but it is real, measurable, and rising.” The current conflict, therefore, represents not only a geopolitical crisis but a climate setback that undermines global progress. Damage That Lingers: Unlike physical infrastructure, which can be rebuilt, environmental damage often persists long after the guns fall silent. Soil contamination can reduce agricultural productivity for years, while polluted water systems may take decades to recover. Historical precedents from the Gulf War’s oil fires to conflicts in Iraq and Syria, demonstrate that environmental scars of war can endure for generations. The situation unfolding in Iran risks adding to this legacy, with long-term ecological consequences that may only fully emerge over time. Regional and Global Implications: How conflict in Middle East threatens global food systems -Expert 1.5m pilgrims kick off Hajj as Middle East peace deal falters Middle East crisis: How Tinubu’s policy of naira-for-crude guarantees supply security The environmental consequences of the conflict extend beyond national borders. Air pollution travels across regions, and contaminated water systems can affect neighbouring countries. At the same time, disruptions to oil supply chains are influencing global energy markets. Rising uncertainty may push countries to rely more heavily on fossil fuels, thus slowing down the transition to cleaner energy. Read Also: Omo-Agege alleges attack on convoy in Delta, six NDC members injured For countries like Nigeria, this presents a complex reality; balancing economic opportunities from oil price rise, with the urgency of climate resilience and sustainability. The Human Dimension: At the heart of the environmental crisis are people. Communities near affected areas face immediate health risks from polluted air and water. Respiratory illnesses, skin diseases and other health complications often increase in such conditions. Farmers may lose crops, while fishermen face declining catches due to polluted ecosystems. These impacts deepen poverty and complicate recovery efforts. Environmental damage therefore, is not separate from humanitarian concerns, it is central to them. An Overlooked Aspect of War Despite its scale, the environmental cost of war often receives limited attention in global discourse. While international law recognises environmental protection, enforcement remains weak. This gap underscores the need for a broader understanding of security; one that includes environmental stability as a foundation for peace. A Call for Accountability: As the conflict continues, the need for environmental accountability grows more urgent. Monitoring, documentation and eventual restoration must be part of any long-term response. Rebuilding efforts must go beyond infrastructure to include ecosystems, ensuring that recovery is both sustainable and inclusive. Beyond the Battlefield: The smoke rising from burning oil facilities is more than a symbol of conflict, it is a warning. A reminder that war’s consequences extend far beyond immediate destruction. “Peace is not only a political necessity—it is an environmental one.” As the world confronts climate change, the intersection of conflict and environmental degradation can no longer be ignored. The cost of war is not only measured in lives lost, but in the damage done to the planet that sustains them. • Adeleye is a PhD., Ibadan. Researcher in Environmental Pollution and Control [email protected] +2348035256450

Recent strikes on oil facilities, industrial zones and energy infrastructure in parts of Iran have triggered fires, toxic emissions and widespread pollution. Reports of darkened skies and what observers have described as “black rain” have raised alarm among environmental experts. “War does not only destroy cities and lives; it poisons the air, land and water that sustain them.” These developments highlight a critical but often overlooked dimension of conflict; the lasting damage to ecosystems and the climate. When War Meets the Environment: Modern warfare is not only destructive to lives and infrastructure; it is also deeply harmful to the environment. Explosions, oil fires, chemical leaks and the destruction of industrial facilities release massive quantities of pollutants into the air, soil and water systems. In the current conflict, attacks on oil depots and refineries may be particularly damaging. Burning crude oil produces thick plumes of smoke containing carbon dioxide, sulfur dioxide, nitrogen oxides and particulate matter. These pollutants contribute to air quality deterioration, acid rain formation and long-term health risks. “Black rain is not just a symbol of destruction, it is a toxic legacy that can outlive the war itself.” The phenomenon of contaminated rainfall occurs when soot and chemical particles mix with atmospheric moisture and fall back to the ground, poisoning farmland and water sources. A Climate Setback in Real Time: Beyond immediate pollution, these environmental impacts feed into the broader climate crisis. Oil fires and explosions release significant amounts of greenhouse gases, accelerating global warming at a time when countries are struggling to meet emissions reduction targets. Military activities themselves have been considered to be carbon-intensive. Fighter jets, naval fleets and armoured vehicles consume vast amounts of fossil fuels, yet these emissions are rarely captured in global climate accounting. “The climate cost of war is often invisible, but it is real, measurable, and rising.” The current conflict, therefore, represents not only a geopolitical crisis but a climate setback that undermines global progress. Damage That Lingers: Unlike physical infrastructure, which can be rebuilt, environmental damage often persists long after the guns fall silent. Soil contamination can reduce agricultural productivity for years, while polluted water systems may take decades to recover. Historical precedents from the Gulf War’s oil fires to conflicts in Iraq and Syria, demonstrate that environmental scars of war can endure for generations. The situation unfolding in Iran risks adding to this legacy, with long-term ecological consequences that may only fully emerge over time. Regional and Global Implications: How conflict in Middle East threatens global food systems -Expert 1.5m pilgrims kick off Hajj as Middle East peace deal falters Middle East crisis: How Tinubu’s policy of naira-for-crude guarantees supply security The environmental consequences of the conflict extend beyond national borders. Air pollution travels across regions, and contaminated water systems can affect neighbouring countries. At the same time, disruptions to oil supply chains are influencing global energy markets. Rising uncertainty may push countries to rely more heavily on fossil fuels, thus slowing down the transition to cleaner energy. Read Also: Omo-Agege alleges attack on convoy in Delta, six NDC members injured For countries like Nigeria, this presents a complex reality; balancing economic opportunities from oil price rise, with the urgency of climate resilience and sustainability. The Human Dimension: At the heart of the environmental crisis are people. Communities near affected areas face immediate health risks from polluted air and water. Respiratory illnesses, skin diseases and other health complications often increase in such conditions. Farmers may lose crops, while fishermen face declining catches due to polluted ecosystems. These impacts deepen poverty and complicate recovery efforts. Environmental damage therefore, is not separate from humanitarian concerns, it is central to them. An Overlooked Aspect of War Despite its scale, the environmental cost of war often receives limited attention in global discourse. While international law recognises environmental protection, enforcement remains weak. This gap underscores the need for a broader understanding of security; one that includes environmental stability as a foundation for peace. A Call for Accountability: As the conflict continues, the need for environmental accountability grows more urgent. Monitoring, documentation and eventual restoration must be part of any long-term response. Rebuilding efforts must go beyond infrastructure to include ecosystems, ensuring that recovery is both sustainable and inclusive. Beyond the Battlefield: The smoke rising from burning oil facilities is more than a symbol of conflict, it is a warning. A reminder that war’s consequences extend far beyond immediate destruction. “Peace is not only a political necessity—it is an environmental one.” As the world confronts climate change, the intersection of conflict and environmental degradation can no longer be ignored. The cost of war is not only measured in lives lost, but in the damage done to the planet that sustains them. • Adeleye is a PhD., Ibadan. Researcher in Environmental Pollution and Control [email protected] +2348035256450

“War does not only destroy cities and lives; it poisons the air, land and water that sustain them.” These developments highlight a critical but often overlooked dimension of conflict; the lasting damage to ecosystems and the climate. When War Meets the Environment: Modern warfare is not only destructive to lives and infrastructure; it is also deeply harmful to the environment. Explosions, oil fires, chemical leaks and the destruction of industrial facilities release massive quantities of pollutants into the air, soil and water systems. In the current conflict, attacks on oil depots and refineries may be particularly damaging. Burning crude oil produces thick plumes of smoke containing carbon dioxide, sulfur dioxide, nitrogen oxides and particulate matter. These pollutants contribute to air quality deterioration, acid rain formation and long-term health risks. “Black rain is not just a symbol of destruction, it is a toxic legacy that can outlive the war itself.” The phenomenon of contaminated rainfall occurs when soot and chemical particles mix with atmospheric moisture and fall back to the ground, poisoning farmland and water sources. A Climate Setback in Real Time: Beyond immediate pollution, these environmental impacts feed into the broader climate crisis. Oil fires and explosions release significant amounts of greenhouse gases, accelerating global warming at a time when countries are struggling to meet emissions reduction targets. Military activities themselves have been considered to be carbon-intensive. Fighter jets, naval fleets and armoured vehicles consume vast amounts of fossil fuels, yet these emissions are rarely captured in global climate accounting. “The climate cost of war is often invisible, but it is real, measurable, and rising.” The current conflict, therefore, represents not only a geopolitical crisis but a climate setback that undermines global progress. Damage That Lingers: Unlike physical infrastructure, which can be rebuilt, environmental damage often persists long after the guns fall silent. Soil contamination can reduce agricultural productivity for years, while polluted water systems may take decades to recover. Historical precedents from the Gulf War’s oil fires to conflicts in Iraq and Syria, demonstrate that environmental scars of war can endure for generations. The situation unfolding in Iran risks adding to this legacy, with long-term ecological consequences that may only fully emerge over time. Regional and Global Implications: How conflict in Middle East threatens global food systems -Expert 1.5m pilgrims kick off Hajj as Middle East peace deal falters Middle East crisis: How Tinubu’s policy of naira-for-crude guarantees supply security The environmental consequences of the conflict extend beyond national borders. Air pollution travels across regions, and contaminated water systems can affect neighbouring countries. At the same time, disruptions to oil supply chains are influencing global energy markets. Rising uncertainty may push countries to rely more heavily on fossil fuels, thus slowing down the transition to cleaner energy. Read Also: Omo-Agege alleges attack on convoy in Delta, six NDC members injured For countries like Nigeria, this presents a complex reality; balancing economic opportunities from oil price rise, with the urgency of climate resilience and sustainability. The Human Dimension: At the heart of the environmental crisis are people. Communities near affected areas face immediate health risks from polluted air and water. Respiratory illnesses, skin diseases and other health complications often increase in such conditions. Farmers may lose crops, while fishermen face declining catches due to polluted ecosystems. These impacts deepen poverty and complicate recovery efforts. Environmental damage therefore, is not separate from humanitarian concerns, it is central to them. An Overlooked Aspect of War Despite its scale, the environmental cost of war often receives limited attention in global discourse. While international law recognises environmental protection, enforcement remains weak. This gap underscores the need for a broader understanding of security; one that includes environmental stability as a foundation for peace. A Call for Accountability: As the conflict continues, the need for environmental accountability grows more urgent. Monitoring, documentation and eventual restoration must be part of any long-term response. Rebuilding efforts must go beyond infrastructure to include ecosystems, ensuring that recovery is both sustainable and inclusive. Beyond the Battlefield: The smoke rising from burning oil facilities is more than a symbol of conflict, it is a warning. A reminder that war’s consequences extend far beyond immediate destruction. “Peace is not only a political necessity—it is an environmental one.” As the world confronts climate change, the intersection of conflict and environmental degradation can no longer be ignored. The cost of war is not only measured in lives lost, but in the damage done to the planet that sustains them. • Adeleye is a PhD., Ibadan. Researcher in Environmental Pollution and Control [email protected] +2348035256450

These developments highlight a critical but often overlooked dimension of conflict; the lasting damage to ecosystems and the climate. When War Meets the Environment: Modern warfare is not only destructive to lives and infrastructure; it is also deeply harmful to the environment. Explosions, oil fires, chemical leaks and the destruction of industrial facilities release massive quantities of pollutants into the air, soil and water systems. In the current conflict, attacks on oil depots and refineries may be particularly damaging. Burning crude oil produces thick plumes of smoke containing carbon dioxide, sulfur dioxide, nitrogen oxides and particulate matter. These pollutants contribute to air quality deterioration, acid rain formation and long-term health risks. “Black rain is not just a symbol of destruction, it is a toxic legacy that can outlive the war itself.” The phenomenon of contaminated rainfall occurs when soot and chemical particles mix with atmospheric moisture and fall back to the ground, poisoning farmland and water sources. A Climate Setback in Real Time: Beyond immediate pollution, these environmental impacts feed into the broader climate crisis. Oil fires and explosions release significant amounts of greenhouse gases, accelerating global warming at a time when countries are struggling to meet emissions reduction targets. Military activities themselves have been considered to be carbon-intensive. Fighter jets, naval fleets and armoured vehicles consume vast amounts of fossil fuels, yet these emissions are rarely captured in global climate accounting. “The climate cost of war is often invisible, but it is real, measurable, and rising.” The current conflict, therefore, represents not only a geopolitical crisis but a climate setback that undermines global progress. Damage That Lingers: Unlike physical infrastructure, which can be rebuilt, environmental damage often persists long after the guns fall silent. Soil contamination can reduce agricultural productivity for years, while polluted water systems may take decades to recover. Historical precedents from the Gulf War’s oil fires to conflicts in Iraq and Syria, demonstrate that environmental scars of war can endure for generations. The situation unfolding in Iran risks adding to this legacy, with long-term ecological consequences that may only fully emerge over time. Regional and Global Implications: How conflict in Middle East threatens global food systems -Expert 1.5m pilgrims kick off Hajj as Middle East peace deal falters Middle East crisis: How Tinubu’s policy of naira-for-crude guarantees supply security The environmental consequences of the conflict extend beyond national borders. Air pollution travels across regions, and contaminated water systems can affect neighbouring countries. At the same time, disruptions to oil supply chains are influencing global energy markets. Rising uncertainty may push countries to rely more heavily on fossil fuels, thus slowing down the transition to cleaner energy. Read Also: Omo-Agege alleges attack on convoy in Delta, six NDC members injured For countries like Nigeria, this presents a complex reality; balancing economic opportunities from oil price rise, with the urgency of climate resilience and sustainability. The Human Dimension: At the heart of the environmental crisis are people. Communities near affected areas face immediate health risks from polluted air and water. Respiratory illnesses, skin diseases and other health complications often increase in such conditions. Farmers may lose crops, while fishermen face declining catches due to polluted ecosystems. These impacts deepen poverty and complicate recovery efforts. Environmental damage therefore, is not separate from humanitarian concerns, it is central to them. An Overlooked Aspect of War Despite its scale, the environmental cost of war often receives limited attention in global discourse. While international law recognises environmental protection, enforcement remains weak. This gap underscores the need for a broader understanding of security; one that includes environmental stability as a foundation for peace. A Call for Accountability: As the conflict continues, the need for environmental accountability grows more urgent. Monitoring, documentation and eventual restoration must be part of any long-term response. Rebuilding efforts must go beyond infrastructure to include ecosystems, ensuring that recovery is both sustainable and inclusive. Beyond the Battlefield: The smoke rising from burning oil facilities is more than a symbol of conflict, it is a warning. A reminder that war’s consequences extend far beyond immediate destruction. “Peace is not only a political necessity—it is an environmental one.” As the world confronts climate change, the intersection of conflict and environmental degradation can no longer be ignored. The cost of war is not only measured in lives lost, but in the damage done to the planet that sustains them. • Adeleye is a PhD., Ibadan. Researcher in Environmental Pollution and Control [email protected] +2348035256450

When War Meets the Environment: Modern warfare is not only destructive to lives and infrastructure; it is also deeply harmful to the environment. Explosions, oil fires, chemical leaks and the destruction of industrial facilities release massive quantities of pollutants into the air, soil and water systems. In the current conflict, attacks on oil depots and refineries may be particularly damaging. Burning crude oil produces thick plumes of smoke containing carbon dioxide, sulfur dioxide, nitrogen oxides and particulate matter. These pollutants contribute to air quality deterioration, acid rain formation and long-term health risks. “Black rain is not just a symbol of destruction, it is a toxic legacy that can outlive the war itself.” The phenomenon of contaminated rainfall occurs when soot and chemical particles mix with atmospheric moisture and fall back to the ground, poisoning farmland and water sources. A Climate Setback in Real Time: Beyond immediate pollution, these environmental impacts feed into the broader climate crisis. Oil fires and explosions release significant amounts of greenhouse gases, accelerating global warming at a time when countries are struggling to meet emissions reduction targets. Military activities themselves have been considered to be carbon-intensive. Fighter jets, naval fleets and armoured vehicles consume vast amounts of fossil fuels, yet these emissions are rarely captured in global climate accounting. “The climate cost of war is often invisible, but it is real, measurable, and rising.” The current conflict, therefore, represents not only a geopolitical crisis but a climate setback that undermines global progress. Damage That Lingers: Unlike physical infrastructure, which can be rebuilt, environmental damage often persists long after the guns fall silent. Soil contamination can reduce agricultural productivity for years, while polluted water systems may take decades to recover. Historical precedents from the Gulf War’s oil fires to conflicts in Iraq and Syria, demonstrate that environmental scars of war can endure for generations. The situation unfolding in Iran risks adding to this legacy, with long-term ecological consequences that may only fully emerge over time. Regional and Global Implications: How conflict in Middle East threatens global food systems -Expert 1.5m pilgrims kick off Hajj as Middle East peace deal falters Middle East crisis: How Tinubu’s policy of naira-for-crude guarantees supply security The environmental consequences of the conflict extend beyond national borders. Air pollution travels across regions, and contaminated water systems can affect neighbouring countries. At the same time, disruptions to oil supply chains are influencing global energy markets. Rising uncertainty may push countries to rely more heavily on fossil fuels, thus slowing down the transition to cleaner energy. Read Also: Omo-Agege alleges attack on convoy in Delta, six NDC members injured For countries like Nigeria, this presents a complex reality; balancing economic opportunities from oil price rise, with the urgency of climate resilience and sustainability. The Human Dimension: At the heart of the environmental crisis are people. Communities near affected areas face immediate health risks from polluted air and water. Respiratory illnesses, skin diseases and other health complications often increase in such conditions. Farmers may lose crops, while fishermen face declining catches due to polluted ecosystems. These impacts deepen poverty and complicate recovery efforts. Environmental damage therefore, is not separate from humanitarian concerns, it is central to them. An Overlooked Aspect of War Despite its scale, the environmental cost of war often receives limited attention in global discourse. While international law recognises environmental protection, enforcement remains weak. This gap underscores the need for a broader understanding of security; one that includes environmental stability as a foundation for peace. A Call for Accountability: As the conflict continues, the need for environmental accountability grows more urgent. Monitoring, documentation and eventual restoration must be part of any long-term response. Rebuilding efforts must go beyond infrastructure to include ecosystems, ensuring that recovery is both sustainable and inclusive. Beyond the Battlefield: The smoke rising from burning oil facilities is more than a symbol of conflict, it is a warning. A reminder that war’s consequences extend far beyond immediate destruction. “Peace is not only a political necessity—it is an environmental one.” As the world confronts climate change, the intersection of conflict and environmental degradation can no longer be ignored. The cost of war is not only measured in lives lost, but in the damage done to the planet that sustains them. • Adeleye is a PhD., Ibadan. Researcher in Environmental Pollution and Control [email protected] +2348035256450

Modern warfare is not only destructive to lives and infrastructure; it is also deeply harmful to the environment. Explosions, oil fires, chemical leaks and the destruction of industrial facilities release massive quantities of pollutants into the air, soil and water systems. In the current conflict, attacks on oil depots and refineries may be particularly damaging. Burning crude oil produces thick plumes of smoke containing carbon dioxide, sulfur dioxide, nitrogen oxides and particulate matter. These pollutants contribute to air quality deterioration, acid rain formation and long-term health risks. “Black rain is not just a symbol of destruction, it is a toxic legacy that can outlive the war itself.” The phenomenon of contaminated rainfall occurs when soot and chemical particles mix with atmospheric moisture and fall back to the ground, poisoning farmland and water sources. A Climate Setback in Real Time: Beyond immediate pollution, these environmental impacts feed into the broader climate crisis. Oil fires and explosions release significant amounts of greenhouse gases, accelerating global warming at a time when countries are struggling to meet emissions reduction targets. Military activities themselves have been considered to be carbon-intensive. Fighter jets, naval fleets and armoured vehicles consume vast amounts of fossil fuels, yet these emissions are rarely captured in global climate accounting. “The climate cost of war is often invisible, but it is real, measurable, and rising.” The current conflict, therefore, represents not only a geopolitical crisis but a climate setback that undermines global progress. Damage That Lingers: Unlike physical infrastructure, which can be rebuilt, environmental damage often persists long after the guns fall silent. Soil contamination can reduce agricultural productivity for years, while polluted water systems may take decades to recover. Historical precedents from the Gulf War’s oil fires to conflicts in Iraq and Syria, demonstrate that environmental scars of war can endure for generations. The situation unfolding in Iran risks adding to this legacy, with long-term ecological consequences that may only fully emerge over time. Regional and Global Implications: How conflict in Middle East threatens global food systems -Expert 1.5m pilgrims kick off Hajj as Middle East peace deal falters Middle East crisis: How Tinubu’s policy of naira-for-crude guarantees supply security The environmental consequences of the conflict extend beyond national borders. Air pollution travels across regions, and contaminated water systems can affect neighbouring countries. At the same time, disruptions to oil supply chains are influencing global energy markets. Rising uncertainty may push countries to rely more heavily on fossil fuels, thus slowing down the transition to cleaner energy. Read Also: Omo-Agege alleges attack on convoy in Delta, six NDC members injured For countries like Nigeria, this presents a complex reality; balancing economic opportunities from oil price rise, with the urgency of climate resilience and sustainability. The Human Dimension: At the heart of the environmental crisis are people. Communities near affected areas face immediate health risks from polluted air and water. Respiratory illnesses, skin diseases and other health complications often increase in such conditions. Farmers may lose crops, while fishermen face declining catches due to polluted ecosystems. These impacts deepen poverty and complicate recovery efforts. Environmental damage therefore, is not separate from humanitarian concerns, it is central to them. An Overlooked Aspect of War Despite its scale, the environmental cost of war often receives limited attention in global discourse. While international law recognises environmental protection, enforcement remains weak. This gap underscores the need for a broader understanding of security; one that includes environmental stability as a foundation for peace. A Call for Accountability: As the conflict continues, the need for environmental accountability grows more urgent. Monitoring, documentation and eventual restoration must be part of any long-term response. Rebuilding efforts must go beyond infrastructure to include ecosystems, ensuring that recovery is both sustainable and inclusive. Beyond the Battlefield: The smoke rising from burning oil facilities is more than a symbol of conflict, it is a warning. A reminder that war’s consequences extend far beyond immediate destruction. “Peace is not only a political necessity—it is an environmental one.” As the world confronts climate change, the intersection of conflict and environmental degradation can no longer be ignored. The cost of war is not only measured in lives lost, but in the damage done to the planet that sustains them. • Adeleye is a PhD., Ibadan. Researcher in Environmental Pollution and Control [email protected] +2348035256450

In the current conflict, attacks on oil depots and refineries may be particularly damaging. Burning crude oil produces thick plumes of smoke containing carbon dioxide, sulfur dioxide, nitrogen oxides and particulate matter. These pollutants contribute to air quality deterioration, acid rain formation and long-term health risks. “Black rain is not just a symbol of destruction, it is a toxic legacy that can outlive the war itself.” The phenomenon of contaminated rainfall occurs when soot and chemical particles mix with atmospheric moisture and fall back to the ground, poisoning farmland and water sources. A Climate Setback in Real Time: Beyond immediate pollution, these environmental impacts feed into the broader climate crisis. Oil fires and explosions release significant amounts of greenhouse gases, accelerating global warming at a time when countries are struggling to meet emissions reduction targets. Military activities themselves have been considered to be carbon-intensive. Fighter jets, naval fleets and armoured vehicles consume vast amounts of fossil fuels, yet these emissions are rarely captured in global climate accounting. “The climate cost of war is often invisible, but it is real, measurable, and rising.” The current conflict, therefore, represents not only a geopolitical crisis but a climate setback that undermines global progress. Damage That Lingers: Unlike physical infrastructure, which can be rebuilt, environmental damage often persists long after the guns fall silent. Soil contamination can reduce agricultural productivity for years, while polluted water systems may take decades to recover. Historical precedents from the Gulf War’s oil fires to conflicts in Iraq and Syria, demonstrate that environmental scars of war can endure for generations. The situation unfolding in Iran risks adding to this legacy, with long-term ecological consequences that may only fully emerge over time. Regional and Global Implications: How conflict in Middle East threatens global food systems -Expert 1.5m pilgrims kick off Hajj as Middle East peace deal falters Middle East crisis: How Tinubu’s policy of naira-for-crude guarantees supply security The environmental consequences of the conflict extend beyond national borders. Air pollution travels across regions, and contaminated water systems can affect neighbouring countries. At the same time, disruptions to oil supply chains are influencing global energy markets. Rising uncertainty may push countries to rely more heavily on fossil fuels, thus slowing down the transition to cleaner energy. Read Also: Omo-Agege alleges attack on convoy in Delta, six NDC members injured For countries like Nigeria, this presents a complex reality; balancing economic opportunities from oil price rise, with the urgency of climate resilience and sustainability. The Human Dimension: At the heart of the environmental crisis are people. Communities near affected areas face immediate health risks from polluted air and water. Respiratory illnesses, skin diseases and other health complications often increase in such conditions. Farmers may lose crops, while fishermen face declining catches due to polluted ecosystems. These impacts deepen poverty and complicate recovery efforts. Environmental damage therefore, is not separate from humanitarian concerns, it is central to them. An Overlooked Aspect of War Despite its scale, the environmental cost of war often receives limited attention in global discourse. While international law recognises environmental protection, enforcement remains weak. This gap underscores the need for a broader understanding of security; one that includes environmental stability as a foundation for peace. A Call for Accountability: As the conflict continues, the need for environmental accountability grows more urgent. Monitoring, documentation and eventual restoration must be part of any long-term response. Rebuilding efforts must go beyond infrastructure to include ecosystems, ensuring that recovery is both sustainable and inclusive. Beyond the Battlefield: The smoke rising from burning oil facilities is more than a symbol of conflict, it is a warning. A reminder that war’s consequences extend far beyond immediate destruction. “Peace is not only a political necessity—it is an environmental one.” As the world confronts climate change, the intersection of conflict and environmental degradation can no longer be ignored. The cost of war is not only measured in lives lost, but in the damage done to the planet that sustains them. • Adeleye is a PhD., Ibadan. Researcher in Environmental Pollution and Control [email protected] +2348035256450

“Black rain is not just a symbol of destruction, it is a toxic legacy that can outlive the war itself.” The phenomenon of contaminated rainfall occurs when soot and chemical particles mix with atmospheric moisture and fall back to the ground, poisoning farmland and water sources. A Climate Setback in Real Time: Beyond immediate pollution, these environmental impacts feed into the broader climate crisis. Oil fires and explosions release significant amounts of greenhouse gases, accelerating global warming at a time when countries are struggling to meet emissions reduction targets. Military activities themselves have been considered to be carbon-intensive. Fighter jets, naval fleets and armoured vehicles consume vast amounts of fossil fuels, yet these emissions are rarely captured in global climate accounting. “The climate cost of war is often invisible, but it is real, measurable, and rising.” The current conflict, therefore, represents not only a geopolitical crisis but a climate setback that undermines global progress. Damage That Lingers: Unlike physical infrastructure, which can be rebuilt, environmental damage often persists long after the guns fall silent. Soil contamination can reduce agricultural productivity for years, while polluted water systems may take decades to recover. Historical precedents from the Gulf War’s oil fires to conflicts in Iraq and Syria, demonstrate that environmental scars of war can endure for generations. The situation unfolding in Iran risks adding to this legacy, with long-term ecological consequences that may only fully emerge over time. Regional and Global Implications: How conflict in Middle East threatens global food systems -Expert 1.5m pilgrims kick off Hajj as Middle East peace deal falters Middle East crisis: How Tinubu’s policy of naira-for-crude guarantees supply security The environmental consequences of the conflict extend beyond national borders. Air pollution travels across regions, and contaminated water systems can affect neighbouring countries. At the same time, disruptions to oil supply chains are influencing global energy markets. Rising uncertainty may push countries to rely more heavily on fossil fuels, thus slowing down the transition to cleaner energy. Read Also: Omo-Agege alleges attack on convoy in Delta, six NDC members injured For countries like Nigeria, this presents a complex reality; balancing economic opportunities from oil price rise, with the urgency of climate resilience and sustainability. The Human Dimension: At the heart of the environmental crisis are people. Communities near affected areas face immediate health risks from polluted air and water. Respiratory illnesses, skin diseases and other health complications often increase in such conditions. Farmers may lose crops, while fishermen face declining catches due to polluted ecosystems. These impacts deepen poverty and complicate recovery efforts. Environmental damage therefore, is not separate from humanitarian concerns, it is central to them. An Overlooked Aspect of War Despite its scale, the environmental cost of war often receives limited attention in global discourse. While international law recognises environmental protection, enforcement remains weak. This gap underscores the need for a broader understanding of security; one that includes environmental stability as a foundation for peace. A Call for Accountability: As the conflict continues, the need for environmental accountability grows more urgent. Monitoring, documentation and eventual restoration must be part of any long-term response. Rebuilding efforts must go beyond infrastructure to include ecosystems, ensuring that recovery is both sustainable and inclusive. Beyond the Battlefield: The smoke rising from burning oil facilities is more than a symbol of conflict, it is a warning. A reminder that war’s consequences extend far beyond immediate destruction. “Peace is not only a political necessity—it is an environmental one.” As the world confronts climate change, the intersection of conflict and environmental degradation can no longer be ignored. The cost of war is not only measured in lives lost, but in the damage done to the planet that sustains them. • Adeleye is a PhD., Ibadan. Researcher in Environmental Pollution and Control [email protected] +2348035256450

The phenomenon of contaminated rainfall occurs when soot and chemical particles mix with atmospheric moisture and fall back to the ground, poisoning farmland and water sources. A Climate Setback in Real Time: Beyond immediate pollution, these environmental impacts feed into the broader climate crisis. Oil fires and explosions release significant amounts of greenhouse gases, accelerating global warming at a time when countries are struggling to meet emissions reduction targets. Military activities themselves have been considered to be carbon-intensive. Fighter jets, naval fleets and armoured vehicles consume vast amounts of fossil fuels, yet these emissions are rarely captured in global climate accounting. “The climate cost of war is often invisible, but it is real, measurable, and rising.” The current conflict, therefore, represents not only a geopolitical crisis but a climate setback that undermines global progress. Damage That Lingers: Unlike physical infrastructure, which can be rebuilt, environmental damage often persists long after the guns fall silent. Soil contamination can reduce agricultural productivity for years, while polluted water systems may take decades to recover. Historical precedents from the Gulf War’s oil fires to conflicts in Iraq and Syria, demonstrate that environmental scars of war can endure for generations. The situation unfolding in Iran risks adding to this legacy, with long-term ecological consequences that may only fully emerge over time. Regional and Global Implications: How conflict in Middle East threatens global food systems -Expert 1.5m pilgrims kick off Hajj as Middle East peace deal falters Middle East crisis: How Tinubu’s policy of naira-for-crude guarantees supply security The environmental consequences of the conflict extend beyond national borders. Air pollution travels across regions, and contaminated water systems can affect neighbouring countries. At the same time, disruptions to oil supply chains are influencing global energy markets. Rising uncertainty may push countries to rely more heavily on fossil fuels, thus slowing down the transition to cleaner energy. Read Also: Omo-Agege alleges attack on convoy in Delta, six NDC members injured For countries like Nigeria, this presents a complex reality; balancing economic opportunities from oil price rise, with the urgency of climate resilience and sustainability. The Human Dimension: At the heart of the environmental crisis are people. Communities near affected areas face immediate health risks from polluted air and water. Respiratory illnesses, skin diseases and other health complications often increase in such conditions. Farmers may lose crops, while fishermen face declining catches due to polluted ecosystems. These impacts deepen poverty and complicate recovery efforts. Environmental damage therefore, is not separate from humanitarian concerns, it is central to them. An Overlooked Aspect of War Despite its scale, the environmental cost of war often receives limited attention in global discourse. While international law recognises environmental protection, enforcement remains weak. This gap underscores the need for a broader understanding of security; one that includes environmental stability as a foundation for peace. A Call for Accountability: As the conflict continues, the need for environmental accountability grows more urgent. Monitoring, documentation and eventual restoration must be part of any long-term response. Rebuilding efforts must go beyond infrastructure to include ecosystems, ensuring that recovery is both sustainable and inclusive. Beyond the Battlefield: The smoke rising from burning oil facilities is more than a symbol of conflict, it is a warning. A reminder that war’s consequences extend far beyond immediate destruction. “Peace is not only a political necessity—it is an environmental one.” As the world confronts climate change, the intersection of conflict and environmental degradation can no longer be ignored. The cost of war is not only measured in lives lost, but in the damage done to the planet that sustains them. • Adeleye is a PhD., Ibadan. Researcher in Environmental Pollution and Control [email protected] +2348035256450

A Climate Setback in Real Time: Beyond immediate pollution, these environmental impacts feed into the broader climate crisis. Oil fires and explosions release significant amounts of greenhouse gases, accelerating global warming at a time when countries are struggling to meet emissions reduction targets. Military activities themselves have been considered to be carbon-intensive. Fighter jets, naval fleets and armoured vehicles consume vast amounts of fossil fuels, yet these emissions are rarely captured in global climate accounting. “The climate cost of war is often invisible, but it is real, measurable, and rising.” The current conflict, therefore, represents not only a geopolitical crisis but a climate setback that undermines global progress. Damage That Lingers: Unlike physical infrastructure, which can be rebuilt, environmental damage often persists long after the guns fall silent. Soil contamination can reduce agricultural productivity for years, while polluted water systems may take decades to recover. Historical precedents from the Gulf War’s oil fires to conflicts in Iraq and Syria, demonstrate that environmental scars of war can endure for generations. The situation unfolding in Iran risks adding to this legacy, with long-term ecological consequences that may only fully emerge over time. Regional and Global Implications: How conflict in Middle East threatens global food systems -Expert 1.5m pilgrims kick off Hajj as Middle East peace deal falters Middle East crisis: How Tinubu’s policy of naira-for-crude guarantees supply security The environmental consequences of the conflict extend beyond national borders. Air pollution travels across regions, and contaminated water systems can affect neighbouring countries. At the same time, disruptions to oil supply chains are influencing global energy markets. Rising uncertainty may push countries to rely more heavily on fossil fuels, thus slowing down the transition to cleaner energy. Read Also: Omo-Agege alleges attack on convoy in Delta, six NDC members injured For countries like Nigeria, this presents a complex reality; balancing economic opportunities from oil price rise, with the urgency of climate resilience and sustainability. The Human Dimension: At the heart of the environmental crisis are people. Communities near affected areas face immediate health risks from polluted air and water. Respiratory illnesses, skin diseases and other health complications often increase in such conditions. Farmers may lose crops, while fishermen face declining catches due to polluted ecosystems. These impacts deepen poverty and complicate recovery efforts. Environmental damage therefore, is not separate from humanitarian concerns, it is central to them. An Overlooked Aspect of War Despite its scale, the environmental cost of war often receives limited attention in global discourse. While international law recognises environmental protection, enforcement remains weak. This gap underscores the need for a broader understanding of security; one that includes environmental stability as a foundation for peace. A Call for Accountability: As the conflict continues, the need for environmental accountability grows more urgent. Monitoring, documentation and eventual restoration must be part of any long-term response. Rebuilding efforts must go beyond infrastructure to include ecosystems, ensuring that recovery is both sustainable and inclusive. Beyond the Battlefield: The smoke rising from burning oil facilities is more than a symbol of conflict, it is a warning. A reminder that war’s consequences extend far beyond immediate destruction. “Peace is not only a political necessity—it is an environmental one.” As the world confronts climate change, the intersection of conflict and environmental degradation can no longer be ignored. The cost of war is not only measured in lives lost, but in the damage done to the planet that sustains them. • Adeleye is a PhD., Ibadan. Researcher in Environmental Pollution and Control [email protected] +2348035256450

Beyond immediate pollution, these environmental impacts feed into the broader climate crisis. Oil fires and explosions release significant amounts of greenhouse gases, accelerating global warming at a time when countries are struggling to meet emissions reduction targets. Military activities themselves have been considered to be carbon-intensive. Fighter jets, naval fleets and armoured vehicles consume vast amounts of fossil fuels, yet these emissions are rarely captured in global climate accounting. “The climate cost of war is often invisible, but it is real, measurable, and rising.” The current conflict, therefore, represents not only a geopolitical crisis but a climate setback that undermines global progress. Damage That Lingers: Unlike physical infrastructure, which can be rebuilt, environmental damage often persists long after the guns fall silent. Soil contamination can reduce agricultural productivity for years, while polluted water systems may take decades to recover. Historical precedents from the Gulf War’s oil fires to conflicts in Iraq and Syria, demonstrate that environmental scars of war can endure for generations. The situation unfolding in Iran risks adding to this legacy, with long-term ecological consequences that may only fully emerge over time. Regional and Global Implications: How conflict in Middle East threatens global food systems -Expert 1.5m pilgrims kick off Hajj as Middle East peace deal falters Middle East crisis: How Tinubu’s policy of naira-for-crude guarantees supply security The environmental consequences of the conflict extend beyond national borders. Air pollution travels across regions, and contaminated water systems can affect neighbouring countries. At the same time, disruptions to oil supply chains are influencing global energy markets. Rising uncertainty may push countries to rely more heavily on fossil fuels, thus slowing down the transition to cleaner energy. Read Also: Omo-Agege alleges attack on convoy in Delta, six NDC members injured For countries like Nigeria, this presents a complex reality; balancing economic opportunities from oil price rise, with the urgency of climate resilience and sustainability. The Human Dimension: At the heart of the environmental crisis are people. Communities near affected areas face immediate health risks from polluted air and water. Respiratory illnesses, skin diseases and other health complications often increase in such conditions. Farmers may lose crops, while fishermen face declining catches due to polluted ecosystems. These impacts deepen poverty and complicate recovery efforts. Environmental damage therefore, is not separate from humanitarian concerns, it is central to them. An Overlooked Aspect of War Despite its scale, the environmental cost of war often receives limited attention in global discourse. While international law recognises environmental protection, enforcement remains weak. This gap underscores the need for a broader understanding of security; one that includes environmental stability as a foundation for peace. A Call for Accountability: As the conflict continues, the need for environmental accountability grows more urgent. Monitoring, documentation and eventual restoration must be part of any long-term response. Rebuilding efforts must go beyond infrastructure to include ecosystems, ensuring that recovery is both sustainable and inclusive. Beyond the Battlefield: The smoke rising from burning oil facilities is more than a symbol of conflict, it is a warning. A reminder that war’s consequences extend far beyond immediate destruction. “Peace is not only a political necessity—it is an environmental one.” As the world confronts climate change, the intersection of conflict and environmental degradation can no longer be ignored. The cost of war is not only measured in lives lost, but in the damage done to the planet that sustains them. • Adeleye is a PhD., Ibadan. Researcher in Environmental Pollution and Control [email protected] +2348035256450

Military activities themselves have been considered to be carbon-intensive. Fighter jets, naval fleets and armoured vehicles consume vast amounts of fossil fuels, yet these emissions are rarely captured in global climate accounting. “The climate cost of war is often invisible, but it is real, measurable, and rising.” The current conflict, therefore, represents not only a geopolitical crisis but a climate setback that undermines global progress. Damage That Lingers: Unlike physical infrastructure, which can be rebuilt, environmental damage often persists long after the guns fall silent. Soil contamination can reduce agricultural productivity for years, while polluted water systems may take decades to recover. Historical precedents from the Gulf War’s oil fires to conflicts in Iraq and Syria, demonstrate that environmental scars of war can endure for generations. The situation unfolding in Iran risks adding to this legacy, with long-term ecological consequences that may only fully emerge over time. Regional and Global Implications: How conflict in Middle East threatens global food systems -Expert 1.5m pilgrims kick off Hajj as Middle East peace deal falters Middle East crisis: How Tinubu’s policy of naira-for-crude guarantees supply security The environmental consequences of the conflict extend beyond national borders. Air pollution travels across regions, and contaminated water systems can affect neighbouring countries. At the same time, disruptions to oil supply chains are influencing global energy markets. Rising uncertainty may push countries to rely more heavily on fossil fuels, thus slowing down the transition to cleaner energy. Read Also: Omo-Agege alleges attack on convoy in Delta, six NDC members injured For countries like Nigeria, this presents a complex reality; balancing economic opportunities from oil price rise, with the urgency of climate resilience and sustainability. The Human Dimension: At the heart of the environmental crisis are people. Communities near affected areas face immediate health risks from polluted air and water. Respiratory illnesses, skin diseases and other health complications often increase in such conditions. Farmers may lose crops, while fishermen face declining catches due to polluted ecosystems. These impacts deepen poverty and complicate recovery efforts. Environmental damage therefore, is not separate from humanitarian concerns, it is central to them. An Overlooked Aspect of War Despite its scale, the environmental cost of war often receives limited attention in global discourse. While international law recognises environmental protection, enforcement remains weak. This gap underscores the need for a broader understanding of security; one that includes environmental stability as a foundation for peace. A Call for Accountability: As the conflict continues, the need for environmental accountability grows more urgent. Monitoring, documentation and eventual restoration must be part of any long-term response. Rebuilding efforts must go beyond infrastructure to include ecosystems, ensuring that recovery is both sustainable and inclusive. Beyond the Battlefield: The smoke rising from burning oil facilities is more than a symbol of conflict, it is a warning. A reminder that war’s consequences extend far beyond immediate destruction. “Peace is not only a political necessity—it is an environmental one.” As the world confronts climate change, the intersection of conflict and environmental degradation can no longer be ignored. The cost of war is not only measured in lives lost, but in the damage done to the planet that sustains them. • Adeleye is a PhD., Ibadan. Researcher in Environmental Pollution and Control [email protected] +2348035256450

“The climate cost of war is often invisible, but it is real, measurable, and rising.” The current conflict, therefore, represents not only a geopolitical crisis but a climate setback that undermines global progress. Damage That Lingers: Unlike physical infrastructure, which can be rebuilt, environmental damage often persists long after the guns fall silent. Soil contamination can reduce agricultural productivity for years, while polluted water systems may take decades to recover. Historical precedents from the Gulf War’s oil fires to conflicts in Iraq and Syria, demonstrate that environmental scars of war can endure for generations. The situation unfolding in Iran risks adding to this legacy, with long-term ecological consequences that may only fully emerge over time. Regional and Global Implications: How conflict in Middle East threatens global food systems -Expert 1.5m pilgrims kick off Hajj as Middle East peace deal falters Middle East crisis: How Tinubu’s policy of naira-for-crude guarantees supply security The environmental consequences of the conflict extend beyond national borders. Air pollution travels across regions, and contaminated water systems can affect neighbouring countries. At the same time, disruptions to oil supply chains are influencing global energy markets. Rising uncertainty may push countries to rely more heavily on fossil fuels, thus slowing down the transition to cleaner energy. Read Also: Omo-Agege alleges attack on convoy in Delta, six NDC members injured For countries like Nigeria, this presents a complex reality; balancing economic opportunities from oil price rise, with the urgency of climate resilience and sustainability. The Human Dimension: At the heart of the environmental crisis are people. Communities near affected areas face immediate health risks from polluted air and water. Respiratory illnesses, skin diseases and other health complications often increase in such conditions. Farmers may lose crops, while fishermen face declining catches due to polluted ecosystems. These impacts deepen poverty and complicate recovery efforts. Environmental damage therefore, is not separate from humanitarian concerns, it is central to them. An Overlooked Aspect of War Despite its scale, the environmental cost of war often receives limited attention in global discourse. While international law recognises environmental protection, enforcement remains weak. This gap underscores the need for a broader understanding of security; one that includes environmental stability as a foundation for peace. A Call for Accountability: As the conflict continues, the need for environmental accountability grows more urgent. Monitoring, documentation and eventual restoration must be part of any long-term response. Rebuilding efforts must go beyond infrastructure to include ecosystems, ensuring that recovery is both sustainable and inclusive. Beyond the Battlefield: The smoke rising from burning oil facilities is more than a symbol of conflict, it is a warning. A reminder that war’s consequences extend far beyond immediate destruction. “Peace is not only a political necessity—it is an environmental one.” As the world confronts climate change, the intersection of conflict and environmental degradation can no longer be ignored. The cost of war is not only measured in lives lost, but in the damage done to the planet that sustains them. • Adeleye is a PhD., Ibadan. Researcher in Environmental Pollution and Control [email protected] +2348035256450

The current conflict, therefore, represents not only a geopolitical crisis but a climate setback that undermines global progress. Damage That Lingers: Unlike physical infrastructure, which can be rebuilt, environmental damage often persists long after the guns fall silent. Soil contamination can reduce agricultural productivity for years, while polluted water systems may take decades to recover. Historical precedents from the Gulf War’s oil fires to conflicts in Iraq and Syria, demonstrate that environmental scars of war can endure for generations. The situation unfolding in Iran risks adding to this legacy, with long-term ecological consequences that may only fully emerge over time. Regional and Global Implications: How conflict in Middle East threatens global food systems -Expert 1.5m pilgrims kick off Hajj as Middle East peace deal falters Middle East crisis: How Tinubu’s policy of naira-for-crude guarantees supply security The environmental consequences of the conflict extend beyond national borders. Air pollution travels across regions, and contaminated water systems can affect neighbouring countries. At the same time, disruptions to oil supply chains are influencing global energy markets. Rising uncertainty may push countries to rely more heavily on fossil fuels, thus slowing down the transition to cleaner energy. Read Also: Omo-Agege alleges attack on convoy in Delta, six NDC members injured For countries like Nigeria, this presents a complex reality; balancing economic opportunities from oil price rise, with the urgency of climate resilience and sustainability. The Human Dimension: At the heart of the environmental crisis are people. Communities near affected areas face immediate health risks from polluted air and water. Respiratory illnesses, skin diseases and other health complications often increase in such conditions. Farmers may lose crops, while fishermen face declining catches due to polluted ecosystems. These impacts deepen poverty and complicate recovery efforts. Environmental damage therefore, is not separate from humanitarian concerns, it is central to them. An Overlooked Aspect of War Despite its scale, the environmental cost of war often receives limited attention in global discourse. While international law recognises environmental protection, enforcement remains weak. This gap underscores the need for a broader understanding of security; one that includes environmental stability as a foundation for peace. A Call for Accountability: As the conflict continues, the need for environmental accountability grows more urgent. Monitoring, documentation and eventual restoration must be part of any long-term response. Rebuilding efforts must go beyond infrastructure to include ecosystems, ensuring that recovery is both sustainable and inclusive. Beyond the Battlefield: The smoke rising from burning oil facilities is more than a symbol of conflict, it is a warning. A reminder that war’s consequences extend far beyond immediate destruction. “Peace is not only a political necessity—it is an environmental one.” As the world confronts climate change, the intersection of conflict and environmental degradation can no longer be ignored. The cost of war is not only measured in lives lost, but in the damage done to the planet that sustains them. • Adeleye is a PhD., Ibadan. Researcher in Environmental Pollution and Control [email protected] +2348035256450

Damage That Lingers: Unlike physical infrastructure, which can be rebuilt, environmental damage often persists long after the guns fall silent. Soil contamination can reduce agricultural productivity for years, while polluted water systems may take decades to recover. Historical precedents from the Gulf War’s oil fires to conflicts in Iraq and Syria, demonstrate that environmental scars of war can endure for generations. The situation unfolding in Iran risks adding to this legacy, with long-term ecological consequences that may only fully emerge over time. Regional and Global Implications: How conflict in Middle East threatens global food systems -Expert 1.5m pilgrims kick off Hajj as Middle East peace deal falters Middle East crisis: How Tinubu’s policy of naira-for-crude guarantees supply security The environmental consequences of the conflict extend beyond national borders. Air pollution travels across regions, and contaminated water systems can affect neighbouring countries. At the same time, disruptions to oil supply chains are influencing global energy markets. Rising uncertainty may push countries to rely more heavily on fossil fuels, thus slowing down the transition to cleaner energy. Read Also: Omo-Agege alleges attack on convoy in Delta, six NDC members injured For countries like Nigeria, this presents a complex reality; balancing economic opportunities from oil price rise, with the urgency of climate resilience and sustainability. The Human Dimension: At the heart of the environmental crisis are people. Communities near affected areas face immediate health risks from polluted air and water. Respiratory illnesses, skin diseases and other health complications often increase in such conditions. Farmers may lose crops, while fishermen face declining catches due to polluted ecosystems. These impacts deepen poverty and complicate recovery efforts. Environmental damage therefore, is not separate from humanitarian concerns, it is central to them. An Overlooked Aspect of War Despite its scale, the environmental cost of war often receives limited attention in global discourse. While international law recognises environmental protection, enforcement remains weak. This gap underscores the need for a broader understanding of security; one that includes environmental stability as a foundation for peace. A Call for Accountability: As the conflict continues, the need for environmental accountability grows more urgent. Monitoring, documentation and eventual restoration must be part of any long-term response. Rebuilding efforts must go beyond infrastructure to include ecosystems, ensuring that recovery is both sustainable and inclusive. Beyond the Battlefield: The smoke rising from burning oil facilities is more than a symbol of conflict, it is a warning. A reminder that war’s consequences extend far beyond immediate destruction. “Peace is not only a political necessity—it is an environmental one.” As the world confronts climate change, the intersection of conflict and environmental degradation can no longer be ignored. The cost of war is not only measured in lives lost, but in the damage done to the planet that sustains them. • Adeleye is a PhD., Ibadan. Researcher in Environmental Pollution and Control [email protected] +2348035256450

Unlike physical infrastructure, which can be rebuilt, environmental damage often persists long after the guns fall silent. Soil contamination can reduce agricultural productivity for years, while polluted water systems may take decades to recover. Historical precedents from the Gulf War’s oil fires to conflicts in Iraq and Syria, demonstrate that environmental scars of war can endure for generations. The situation unfolding in Iran risks adding to this legacy, with long-term ecological consequences that may only fully emerge over time. Regional and Global Implications: How conflict in Middle East threatens global food systems -Expert 1.5m pilgrims kick off Hajj as Middle East peace deal falters Middle East crisis: How Tinubu’s policy of naira-for-crude guarantees supply security The environmental consequences of the conflict extend beyond national borders. Air pollution travels across regions, and contaminated water systems can affect neighbouring countries. At the same time, disruptions to oil supply chains are influencing global energy markets. Rising uncertainty may push countries to rely more heavily on fossil fuels, thus slowing down the transition to cleaner energy. Read Also: Omo-Agege alleges attack on convoy in Delta, six NDC members injured For countries like Nigeria, this presents a complex reality; balancing economic opportunities from oil price rise, with the urgency of climate resilience and sustainability. The Human Dimension: At the heart of the environmental crisis are people. Communities near affected areas face immediate health risks from polluted air and water. Respiratory illnesses, skin diseases and other health complications often increase in such conditions. Farmers may lose crops, while fishermen face declining catches due to polluted ecosystems. These impacts deepen poverty and complicate recovery efforts. Environmental damage therefore, is not separate from humanitarian concerns, it is central to them. An Overlooked Aspect of War Despite its scale, the environmental cost of war often receives limited attention in global discourse. While international law recognises environmental protection, enforcement remains weak. This gap underscores the need for a broader understanding of security; one that includes environmental stability as a foundation for peace. A Call for Accountability: As the conflict continues, the need for environmental accountability grows more urgent. Monitoring, documentation and eventual restoration must be part of any long-term response. Rebuilding efforts must go beyond infrastructure to include ecosystems, ensuring that recovery is both sustainable and inclusive. Beyond the Battlefield: The smoke rising from burning oil facilities is more than a symbol of conflict, it is a warning. A reminder that war’s consequences extend far beyond immediate destruction. “Peace is not only a political necessity—it is an environmental one.” As the world confronts climate change, the intersection of conflict and environmental degradation can no longer be ignored. The cost of war is not only measured in lives lost, but in the damage done to the planet that sustains them. • Adeleye is a PhD., Ibadan. Researcher in Environmental Pollution and Control [email protected] +2348035256450

Historical precedents from the Gulf War’s oil fires to conflicts in Iraq and Syria, demonstrate that environmental scars of war can endure for generations. The situation unfolding in Iran risks adding to this legacy, with long-term ecological consequences that may only fully emerge over time. Regional and Global Implications: How conflict in Middle East threatens global food systems -Expert 1.5m pilgrims kick off Hajj as Middle East peace deal falters Middle East crisis: How Tinubu’s policy of naira-for-crude guarantees supply security The environmental consequences of the conflict extend beyond national borders. Air pollution travels across regions, and contaminated water systems can affect neighbouring countries. At the same time, disruptions to oil supply chains are influencing global energy markets. Rising uncertainty may push countries to rely more heavily on fossil fuels, thus slowing down the transition to cleaner energy. Read Also: Omo-Agege alleges attack on convoy in Delta, six NDC members injured For countries like Nigeria, this presents a complex reality; balancing economic opportunities from oil price rise, with the urgency of climate resilience and sustainability. The Human Dimension: At the heart of the environmental crisis are people. Communities near affected areas face immediate health risks from polluted air and water. Respiratory illnesses, skin diseases and other health complications often increase in such conditions. Farmers may lose crops, while fishermen face declining catches due to polluted ecosystems. These impacts deepen poverty and complicate recovery efforts. Environmental damage therefore, is not separate from humanitarian concerns, it is central to them. An Overlooked Aspect of War Despite its scale, the environmental cost of war often receives limited attention in global discourse. While international law recognises environmental protection, enforcement remains weak. This gap underscores the need for a broader understanding of security; one that includes environmental stability as a foundation for peace. A Call for Accountability: As the conflict continues, the need for environmental accountability grows more urgent. Monitoring, documentation and eventual restoration must be part of any long-term response. Rebuilding efforts must go beyond infrastructure to include ecosystems, ensuring that recovery is both sustainable and inclusive. Beyond the Battlefield: The smoke rising from burning oil facilities is more than a symbol of conflict, it is a warning. A reminder that war’s consequences extend far beyond immediate destruction. “Peace is not only a political necessity—it is an environmental one.” As the world confronts climate change, the intersection of conflict and environmental degradation can no longer be ignored. The cost of war is not only measured in lives lost, but in the damage done to the planet that sustains them. • Adeleye is a PhD., Ibadan. Researcher in Environmental Pollution and Control [email protected] +2348035256450

The situation unfolding in Iran risks adding to this legacy, with long-term ecological consequences that may only fully emerge over time. Regional and Global Implications: How conflict in Middle East threatens global food systems -Expert 1.5m pilgrims kick off Hajj as Middle East peace deal falters Middle East crisis: How Tinubu’s policy of naira-for-crude guarantees supply security The environmental consequences of the conflict extend beyond national borders. Air pollution travels across regions, and contaminated water systems can affect neighbouring countries. At the same time, disruptions to oil supply chains are influencing global energy markets. Rising uncertainty may push countries to rely more heavily on fossil fuels, thus slowing down the transition to cleaner energy. Read Also: Omo-Agege alleges attack on convoy in Delta, six NDC members injured For countries like Nigeria, this presents a complex reality; balancing economic opportunities from oil price rise, with the urgency of climate resilience and sustainability. The Human Dimension: At the heart of the environmental crisis are people. Communities near affected areas face immediate health risks from polluted air and water. Respiratory illnesses, skin diseases and other health complications often increase in such conditions. Farmers may lose crops, while fishermen face declining catches due to polluted ecosystems. These impacts deepen poverty and complicate recovery efforts. Environmental damage therefore, is not separate from humanitarian concerns, it is central to them. An Overlooked Aspect of War Despite its scale, the environmental cost of war often receives limited attention in global discourse. While international law recognises environmental protection, enforcement remains weak. This gap underscores the need for a broader understanding of security; one that includes environmental stability as a foundation for peace. A Call for Accountability: As the conflict continues, the need for environmental accountability grows more urgent. Monitoring, documentation and eventual restoration must be part of any long-term response. Rebuilding efforts must go beyond infrastructure to include ecosystems, ensuring that recovery is both sustainable and inclusive. Beyond the Battlefield: The smoke rising from burning oil facilities is more than a symbol of conflict, it is a warning. A reminder that war’s consequences extend far beyond immediate destruction. “Peace is not only a political necessity—it is an environmental one.” As the world confronts climate change, the intersection of conflict and environmental degradation can no longer be ignored. The cost of war is not only measured in lives lost, but in the damage done to the planet that sustains them. • Adeleye is a PhD., Ibadan. Researcher in Environmental Pollution and Control [email protected] +2348035256450

Regional and Global Implications: How conflict in Middle East threatens global food systems -Expert 1.5m pilgrims kick off Hajj as Middle East peace deal falters Middle East crisis: How Tinubu’s policy of naira-for-crude guarantees supply security The environmental consequences of the conflict extend beyond national borders. Air pollution travels across regions, and contaminated water systems can affect neighbouring countries. At the same time, disruptions to oil supply chains are influencing global energy markets. Rising uncertainty may push countries to rely more heavily on fossil fuels, thus slowing down the transition to cleaner energy. Read Also: Omo-Agege alleges attack on convoy in Delta, six NDC members injured For countries like Nigeria, this presents a complex reality; balancing economic opportunities from oil price rise, with the urgency of climate resilience and sustainability. The Human Dimension: At the heart of the environmental crisis are people. Communities near affected areas face immediate health risks from polluted air and water. Respiratory illnesses, skin diseases and other health complications often increase in such conditions. Farmers may lose crops, while fishermen face declining catches due to polluted ecosystems. These impacts deepen poverty and complicate recovery efforts. Environmental damage therefore, is not separate from humanitarian concerns, it is central to them. An Overlooked Aspect of War Despite its scale, the environmental cost of war often receives limited attention in global discourse. While international law recognises environmental protection, enforcement remains weak. This gap underscores the need for a broader understanding of security; one that includes environmental stability as a foundation for peace. A Call for Accountability: As the conflict continues, the need for environmental accountability grows more urgent. Monitoring, documentation and eventual restoration must be part of any long-term response. Rebuilding efforts must go beyond infrastructure to include ecosystems, ensuring that recovery is both sustainable and inclusive. Beyond the Battlefield: The smoke rising from burning oil facilities is more than a symbol of conflict, it is a warning. A reminder that war’s consequences extend far beyond immediate destruction. “Peace is not only a political necessity—it is an environmental one.” As the world confronts climate change, the intersection of conflict and environmental degradation can no longer be ignored. The cost of war is not only measured in lives lost, but in the damage done to the planet that sustains them. • Adeleye is a PhD., Ibadan. Researcher in Environmental Pollution and Control [email protected] +2348035256450

The environmental consequences of the conflict extend beyond national borders. Air pollution travels across regions, and contaminated water systems can affect neighbouring countries. At the same time, disruptions to oil supply chains are influencing global energy markets. Rising uncertainty may push countries to rely more heavily on fossil fuels, thus slowing down the transition to cleaner energy. Read Also: Omo-Agege alleges attack on convoy in Delta, six NDC members injured For countries like Nigeria, this presents a complex reality; balancing economic opportunities from oil price rise, with the urgency of climate resilience and sustainability. The Human Dimension: At the heart of the environmental crisis are people. Communities near affected areas face immediate health risks from polluted air and water. Respiratory illnesses, skin diseases and other health complications often increase in such conditions. Farmers may lose crops, while fishermen face declining catches due to polluted ecosystems. These impacts deepen poverty and complicate recovery efforts. Environmental damage therefore, is not separate from humanitarian concerns, it is central to them. An Overlooked Aspect of War Despite its scale, the environmental cost of war often receives limited attention in global discourse. While international law recognises environmental protection, enforcement remains weak. This gap underscores the need for a broader understanding of security; one that includes environmental stability as a foundation for peace. A Call for Accountability: As the conflict continues, the need for environmental accountability grows more urgent. Monitoring, documentation and eventual restoration must be part of any long-term response. Rebuilding efforts must go beyond infrastructure to include ecosystems, ensuring that recovery is both sustainable and inclusive. Beyond the Battlefield: The smoke rising from burning oil facilities is more than a symbol of conflict, it is a warning. A reminder that war’s consequences extend far beyond immediate destruction. “Peace is not only a political necessity—it is an environmental one.” As the world confronts climate change, the intersection of conflict and environmental degradation can no longer be ignored. The cost of war is not only measured in lives lost, but in the damage done to the planet that sustains them. • Adeleye is a PhD., Ibadan. Researcher in Environmental Pollution and Control [email protected] +2348035256450

At the same time, disruptions to oil supply chains are influencing global energy markets. Rising uncertainty may push countries to rely more heavily on fossil fuels, thus slowing down the transition to cleaner energy. Read Also: Omo-Agege alleges attack on convoy in Delta, six NDC members injured For countries like Nigeria, this presents a complex reality; balancing economic opportunities from oil price rise, with the urgency of climate resilience and sustainability. The Human Dimension: At the heart of the environmental crisis are people. Communities near affected areas face immediate health risks from polluted air and water. Respiratory illnesses, skin diseases and other health complications often increase in such conditions. Farmers may lose crops, while fishermen face declining catches due to polluted ecosystems. These impacts deepen poverty and complicate recovery efforts. Environmental damage therefore, is not separate from humanitarian concerns, it is central to them. An Overlooked Aspect of War Despite its scale, the environmental cost of war often receives limited attention in global discourse. While international law recognises environmental protection, enforcement remains weak. This gap underscores the need for a broader understanding of security; one that includes environmental stability as a foundation for peace. A Call for Accountability: As the conflict continues, the need for environmental accountability grows more urgent. Monitoring, documentation and eventual restoration must be part of any long-term response. Rebuilding efforts must go beyond infrastructure to include ecosystems, ensuring that recovery is both sustainable and inclusive. Beyond the Battlefield: The smoke rising from burning oil facilities is more than a symbol of conflict, it is a warning. A reminder that war’s consequences extend far beyond immediate destruction. “Peace is not only a political necessity—it is an environmental one.” As the world confronts climate change, the intersection of conflict and environmental degradation can no longer be ignored. The cost of war is not only measured in lives lost, but in the damage done to the planet that sustains them. • Adeleye is a PhD., Ibadan. Researcher in Environmental Pollution and Control [email protected] +2348035256450

Read Also: Omo-Agege alleges attack on convoy in Delta, six NDC members injured

For countries like Nigeria, this presents a complex reality; balancing economic opportunities from oil price rise, with the urgency of climate resilience and sustainability. The Human Dimension: At the heart of the environmental crisis are people. Communities near affected areas face immediate health risks from polluted air and water. Respiratory illnesses, skin diseases and other health complications often increase in such conditions. Farmers may lose crops, while fishermen face declining catches due to polluted ecosystems. These impacts deepen poverty and complicate recovery efforts. Environmental damage therefore, is not separate from humanitarian concerns, it is central to them. An Overlooked Aspect of War Despite its scale, the environmental cost of war often receives limited attention in global discourse. While international law recognises environmental protection, enforcement remains weak. This gap underscores the need for a broader understanding of security; one that includes environmental stability as a foundation for peace. A Call for Accountability: As the conflict continues, the need for environmental accountability grows more urgent. Monitoring, documentation and eventual restoration must be part of any long-term response. Rebuilding efforts must go beyond infrastructure to include ecosystems, ensuring that recovery is both sustainable and inclusive. Beyond the Battlefield: The smoke rising from burning oil facilities is more than a symbol of conflict, it is a warning. A reminder that war’s consequences extend far beyond immediate destruction. “Peace is not only a political necessity—it is an environmental one.” As the world confronts climate change, the intersection of conflict and environmental degradation can no longer be ignored. The cost of war is not only measured in lives lost, but in the damage done to the planet that sustains them. • Adeleye is a PhD., Ibadan. Researcher in Environmental Pollution and Control [email protected] +2348035256450

The Human Dimension: At the heart of the environmental crisis are people. Communities near affected areas face immediate health risks from polluted air and water. Respiratory illnesses, skin diseases and other health complications often increase in such conditions. Farmers may lose crops, while fishermen face declining catches due to polluted ecosystems. These impacts deepen poverty and complicate recovery efforts. Environmental damage therefore, is not separate from humanitarian concerns, it is central to them. An Overlooked Aspect of War Despite its scale, the environmental cost of war often receives limited attention in global discourse. While international law recognises environmental protection, enforcement remains weak. This gap underscores the need for a broader understanding of security; one that includes environmental stability as a foundation for peace. A Call for Accountability: As the conflict continues, the need for environmental accountability grows more urgent. Monitoring, documentation and eventual restoration must be part of any long-term response. Rebuilding efforts must go beyond infrastructure to include ecosystems, ensuring that recovery is both sustainable and inclusive. Beyond the Battlefield: The smoke rising from burning oil facilities is more than a symbol of conflict, it is a warning. A reminder that war’s consequences extend far beyond immediate destruction. “Peace is not only a political necessity—it is an environmental one.” As the world confronts climate change, the intersection of conflict and environmental degradation can no longer be ignored. The cost of war is not only measured in lives lost, but in the damage done to the planet that sustains them. • Adeleye is a PhD., Ibadan. Researcher in Environmental Pollution and Control [email protected] +2348035256450

At the heart of the environmental crisis are people. Communities near affected areas face immediate health risks from polluted air and water. Respiratory illnesses, skin diseases and other health complications often increase in such conditions. Farmers may lose crops, while fishermen face declining catches due to polluted ecosystems. These impacts deepen poverty and complicate recovery efforts. Environmental damage therefore, is not separate from humanitarian concerns, it is central to them. An Overlooked Aspect of War Despite its scale, the environmental cost of war often receives limited attention in global discourse. While international law recognises environmental protection, enforcement remains weak. This gap underscores the need for a broader understanding of security; one that includes environmental stability as a foundation for peace. A Call for Accountability: As the conflict continues, the need for environmental accountability grows more urgent. Monitoring, documentation and eventual restoration must be part of any long-term response. Rebuilding efforts must go beyond infrastructure to include ecosystems, ensuring that recovery is both sustainable and inclusive. Beyond the Battlefield: The smoke rising from burning oil facilities is more than a symbol of conflict, it is a warning. A reminder that war’s consequences extend far beyond immediate destruction. “Peace is not only a political necessity—it is an environmental one.” As the world confronts climate change, the intersection of conflict and environmental degradation can no longer be ignored. The cost of war is not only measured in lives lost, but in the damage done to the planet that sustains them. • Adeleye is a PhD., Ibadan. Researcher in Environmental Pollution and Control [email protected] +2348035256450

Farmers may lose crops, while fishermen face declining catches due to polluted ecosystems. These impacts deepen poverty and complicate recovery efforts. Environmental damage therefore, is not separate from humanitarian concerns, it is central to them. An Overlooked Aspect of War Despite its scale, the environmental cost of war often receives limited attention in global discourse. While international law recognises environmental protection, enforcement remains weak. This gap underscores the need for a broader understanding of security; one that includes environmental stability as a foundation for peace. A Call for Accountability: As the conflict continues, the need for environmental accountability grows more urgent. Monitoring, documentation and eventual restoration must be part of any long-term response. Rebuilding efforts must go beyond infrastructure to include ecosystems, ensuring that recovery is both sustainable and inclusive. Beyond the Battlefield: The smoke rising from burning oil facilities is more than a symbol of conflict, it is a warning. A reminder that war’s consequences extend far beyond immediate destruction. “Peace is not only a political necessity—it is an environmental one.” As the world confronts climate change, the intersection of conflict and environmental degradation can no longer be ignored. The cost of war is not only measured in lives lost, but in the damage done to the planet that sustains them. • Adeleye is a PhD., Ibadan. Researcher in Environmental Pollution and Control [email protected] +2348035256450

Environmental damage therefore, is not separate from humanitarian concerns, it is central to them. An Overlooked Aspect of War Despite its scale, the environmental cost of war often receives limited attention in global discourse. While international law recognises environmental protection, enforcement remains weak. This gap underscores the need for a broader understanding of security; one that includes environmental stability as a foundation for peace. A Call for Accountability: As the conflict continues, the need for environmental accountability grows more urgent. Monitoring, documentation and eventual restoration must be part of any long-term response. Rebuilding efforts must go beyond infrastructure to include ecosystems, ensuring that recovery is both sustainable and inclusive. Beyond the Battlefield: The smoke rising from burning oil facilities is more than a symbol of conflict, it is a warning. A reminder that war’s consequences extend far beyond immediate destruction. “Peace is not only a political necessity—it is an environmental one.” As the world confronts climate change, the intersection of conflict and environmental degradation can no longer be ignored. The cost of war is not only measured in lives lost, but in the damage done to the planet that sustains them. • Adeleye is a PhD., Ibadan. Researcher in Environmental Pollution and Control [email protected] +2348035256450

An Overlooked Aspect of War Despite its scale, the environmental cost of war often receives limited attention in global discourse. While international law recognises environmental protection, enforcement remains weak. This gap underscores the need for a broader understanding of security; one that includes environmental stability as a foundation for peace. A Call for Accountability: As the conflict continues, the need for environmental accountability grows more urgent. Monitoring, documentation and eventual restoration must be part of any long-term response. Rebuilding efforts must go beyond infrastructure to include ecosystems, ensuring that recovery is both sustainable and inclusive. Beyond the Battlefield: The smoke rising from burning oil facilities is more than a symbol of conflict, it is a warning. A reminder that war’s consequences extend far beyond immediate destruction. “Peace is not only a political necessity—it is an environmental one.” As the world confronts climate change, the intersection of conflict and environmental degradation can no longer be ignored. The cost of war is not only measured in lives lost, but in the damage done to the planet that sustains them. • Adeleye is a PhD., Ibadan. Researcher in Environmental Pollution and Control [email protected] +2348035256450

Despite its scale, the environmental cost of war often receives limited attention in global discourse. While international law recognises environmental protection, enforcement remains weak. This gap underscores the need for a broader understanding of security; one that includes environmental stability as a foundation for peace. A Call for Accountability: As the conflict continues, the need for environmental accountability grows more urgent. Monitoring, documentation and eventual restoration must be part of any long-term response. Rebuilding efforts must go beyond infrastructure to include ecosystems, ensuring that recovery is both sustainable and inclusive. Beyond the Battlefield: The smoke rising from burning oil facilities is more than a symbol of conflict, it is a warning. A reminder that war’s consequences extend far beyond immediate destruction. “Peace is not only a political necessity—it is an environmental one.” As the world confronts climate change, the intersection of conflict and environmental degradation can no longer be ignored. The cost of war is not only measured in lives lost, but in the damage done to the planet that sustains them. • Adeleye is a PhD., Ibadan. Researcher in Environmental Pollution and Control [email protected] +2348035256450

This gap underscores the need for a broader understanding of security; one that includes environmental stability as a foundation for peace. A Call for Accountability: As the conflict continues, the need for environmental accountability grows more urgent. Monitoring, documentation and eventual restoration must be part of any long-term response. Rebuilding efforts must go beyond infrastructure to include ecosystems, ensuring that recovery is both sustainable and inclusive. Beyond the Battlefield: The smoke rising from burning oil facilities is more than a symbol of conflict, it is a warning. A reminder that war’s consequences extend far beyond immediate destruction. “Peace is not only a political necessity—it is an environmental one.” As the world confronts climate change, the intersection of conflict and environmental degradation can no longer be ignored. The cost of war is not only measured in lives lost, but in the damage done to the planet that sustains them. • Adeleye is a PhD., Ibadan. Researcher in Environmental Pollution and Control [email protected] +2348035256450

Source: https://news.google.com/rss/articles/CBMipAFBVV95cUxOV2xMck9NNDMyLWpjcVhKUVRtdUU1UjI5ZXlFWUVlY1RabEhYYUpzanBNOVljeUY1MDYxVmRsU0tNdTFQREljdjRRWGRyTWgzMmp5WmhaNUNvTVRYNnlIU3kzal9sVmJCZzYwRjJEVFhad3FtYUZSQ3Z0S0NwYXZIcnh6SFc0NHY0MjhZVmxiNDJQdEc4Slc1SlVBVHIyZVJ1Qm5odNIBqgFBVV95cUxNNG9EX0s1NmFtVVlkeWNkMnRPUVlaZzBJc190NG5HYlBvbGhET19ZOG5sdWp4MEtSQ01IcVpNR0REaTltYll6eUVqOUhXbU8tOTkzVEh6M0JmT0VHS1FxdDAyb0RPUExMZkJRQU1oUkNjT0F5Wkx6dzlidU9BQkJVbllTZGlRSVpUX0Nzd1d6YkxyOVpfcTJUSzlEM29TNnRFT2pJdFBtT1JIQQ?oc=5